Earlier quoted context omitted.
> In the entire human history of diplomatic relations, nations have always attempted to spy on one another. Yes, and it's all bad. I don't see what's naive, or even controversial, about this.
So the US shouldn't have spied on the Japanese consulate in the 40s to anticipate the forthcoming declaration of war? Or intercepted German transmissions to break the Enigma code?
N.S.A. Devises Radio Pathway Into Computers
111–120 of 147 posts
Re: N.S.A. Devises Radio Pathway Into Computers
#112Earlier quoted context omitted.
What if the foreignerns don't want to spied up on? Or do they count for less?
What is the use of acting naive about foreign affairs, diplomacy, and statecraft? Are you really suggesting that your country's intelligence service doesn't attempt to do the same?
My problem ultimately, as a Brit, is that it seems that we are more and more becoming a satellite of the US, bound by US law and ideals we never ever voted for. We had a referendum on the EU, but never a referendum for all this. But of course that is a British matter and not something the US should be concerned with. If we Brits want to suck up to the US, why would the US turn it down?
I think that what has happened is a nasty mission creep with regard to intelligence. Its used to be all about threats to a given country. The basic point was to understand the intentions of one's enemies. This was and is vital in preventing mistaken action based on not knowing that an enemy has no plan to, say, invade, or what ever. It was based on the idea that knowledge helps prevent paranoia and fear. All of which is not just OK, but vital. It is why in the cold war, both sides accepted this in a gentlemanly way. Both knew it was vital to both to stop both nuking each other. If the USSR said it would not start a war, the West could verify that by spying and have confidence. And vice versa. Now it seems that a lot of it is about gaining advantage in commerce, and local law enforcement. Its fine to say that the NSA has nothing to do with this, but we know that they give access to the FBI and police. We can reasonably believe that its quite possible that the NSA also gives intelligence to large businesses like Lockheed. What has happened is that economic and local criminal issues are now redefined as matters of national security. The lines have not just blurred, but completely crossed over, perhaps gone completely.
As a result, I think we need to re-examine the role and scope of intelligence gathering. Spying needs credibility. And yes, there is a severe danger of throwing out babies in the bathwater. But ultimately, if the people lose confidence in intelligence gathering, we are in a whole lot of trouble. It is vital to get the balance right.
Re: N.S.A. Devises Radio Pathway Into Computers
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
Who's to say that American intelligence gathering is on the right 'side'? Why should members of 'foreign' countries be held to a different standard?
Can we get a Politics tab on the HN bar so we can filter the endless political debates? This should make everyone happy?
I think the current system is fine, where NSA-related stories are (apparently) assigned a handicap to begin with. So those that make it to the home page are usually more significant pieces. And the best way to avoid the "debates" is to not read the comments (if that is what grates you) but just read the story. If even that's too much just read the headline, shrug at the needless brouhaha people are making about it all, and move on to the next news item.
Re: N.S.A. Devises Radio Pathway Into Computers
#114So now one needs to run BSD, air gaped and in a Faraday cage to be 'secure'... So now what does one do with it
Re: N.S.A. Devises Radio Pathway Into Computers
#115This is another example of how Snowden has compromised national security by leaking secret information that has nothing to do with American metadata and everything to do with the NSA's charter and legal mission.
I actually think they have mostly done a good job. I think this story, and the previous one on TAO from Der Spiegel, are substantially different to the other stories that have been run from the leaks.
I do think there is an argument that these kind of details weaken security, and it's far, far less clear cut in my mind that the public interest argument outweighs the security argument in this case.
If you believe it does not that isn't a belief I would challenge - but blame the journalists who have made the wrong call, not Snowden. Deciding which 0.1% of the 100,000 documents to leak is their job.
Re: N.S.A. Devises Radio Pathway Into Computers
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
Who's to say that American intelligence gathering is on the right 'side'? Why should members of 'foreign' countries be held to a different standard?
Can we get a Politics tab on the HN bar so we can filter the endless political debates? This should make everyone happy?
I think it's a little bit silly to expect discussions about these revelations to occur without discussion of politics. The issue is intrinsically political, and many people are calling for political solutions to the problems. By saying "can we please take the politics elsewhere" you are actually shutting down a very important avenue of debate.
Re: N.S.A. Devises Radio Pathway Into Computers
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
The USA has diplomatic relations with foreign countries based on trust. They also trade with those foreign countries - and that international trade is what makes the economy and our lifestyles work. Targeting "all foreigners" destroys trust that foreigners have in the USA system for trade and diplomacy, lowering the impact of the state on both.
Comments like this make me think that maybe all the "acting naive about foreign affairs, diplomacy, and statecraft" is not actually acting. In the entire human history of diplomatic relations, nations have always attempted to spy on one another. Diplomatic relations are not based on trust, they are based on shared beliefs, interests, and goals.
Re: N.S.A. Devises Radio Pathway Into Computers
#118I do understand that it is now the status quo to disavow everything the NSA is, but foreign intelligence gathering is their mission and releasing these details simply doesn't help the cause of fixing the NSA's less savoury incursions. While arguably any foreign intelligence agency of note isn't going to be caught off guard by these leaks, leaking these details does offer political ammunition to the very people who st…
As upset as I am about the NSA, I agree that reports like these may be hard to justify as whistleblowing. This seems to be less about accountability and more about gawking at the NSA's toys. I suppose the NYT could argue that this article only reiterates what was previously reported on the ANT program, and the technology disclosed in that report is over 5 years old. Still, this article may get more attention because…
What they are, is a totalitarian control mechanism for American political and business interests to apply around the world.
So if you are on the 'American' side of this fuzzy, electronic wall that they have erected, and if you are an American who will do what is necessary to further American interests in the world - okay. The NSA is on your side.
But for those of us who do not live under the crux of American hegemony - and there are quite a few of us, after all - knowing about these heinous violations of human rights, and the tactics and technology that these totalitarians are using, is very important. We are not all Americans, here, nor do we all derive profit from American military-industrial efforts.
To some, the NSA is a heinous, despicable construction. I, for one, am glad to see leaks around this organization; as I am with any leaks that will reveal the truth about the tyranny we all live under.
Re: N.S.A. Devises Radio Pathway Into Computers
#119Earlier quoted context omitted.
What if the foreignerns don't want to spied up on? Or do they count for less?
What is the use of acting naive about foreign affairs, diplomacy, and statecraft? Are you really suggesting that your country's intelligence service doesn't attempt to do the same?
And those of us who do not like the actions of our governments can leave. In fact, we do.
So don't think this 'high road' of "you did it too" is going to absolve you of anything. We all leave the playground, eventually.
Re: N.S.A. Devises Radio Pathway Into Computers
#120Earlier quoted context omitted.
As upset as I am about the NSA, I agree that reports like these may be hard to justify as whistleblowing. This seems to be less about accountability and more about gawking at the NSA's toys. I suppose the NYT could argue that this article only reiterates what was previously reported on the ANT program, and the technology disclosed in that report is over 5 years old. Still, this article may get more attention because…
I think that your idolatry of the NSA is unwarranted. They have powers and technologies that they can use to actively thwart anyone who will cross an American interest. They're not a military organization; the military is simply one of their biggest customers. What they are, is a totalitarian control mechanism for American political and business interests to apply around the world. So if you are on the 'American' sid…