Earlier quoted context omitted.
Standing up, taking pictures without hiding, engaging with staff in front of the guys causing the problem, and pointing them out is passive ? What, exactly, would you have her do to escape this passivity?
Passive aggressive behavior does not imply passivity. What would I have done? Well assuming that I'd give a shit, I'd probably talk to the guys directly. You know, "Hey guys, this is a professional conference, let's keep it professional". Again, that's assuming that they actually said something objectionable which I'm not sure they did.
Forking and Dongle Jokes Don't Belong At Tech Conferences
111–120 of 124 posts
Re: Forking and Dongle Jokes Don't Belong At Tech Conferences
#112Earlier quoted context omitted.
>> The problem was directing a "suggestive" / "lewd" conversation at a 3rd Party with no active relationship. There is nothing in the source material that suggests that the conversation was directed at a 3rd party. Person A was having a conversation with Person B, and made a comment that Person C overheard and got offended at. The twitter conversation analogy fits perfectly. How is a joke about socks in pants less se…
Since you didn't say who A, B and C were I have to assume, A - person to the left B - person to the right C - Adria Yes, you have missed the distinction and the twitter "analogy" is false. Adria[C] (I've no idea who any of these people are) turned and spoke to the person to the far left [A] behind her - and it "involved forking the repo to continue development". Then, the "guy next to him" [B] .... um, the 3rd Person…
Apart from this significant difference, both are dick jokes and to me seems to be poking innocent fun but reveals a closed mindedness and double standard from Adria.
Re: Forking and Dongle Jokes Don't Belong At Tech Conferences
#113"What many of you don’t know is that wasn’t the first time that day I had to address this issue around harassment and gender." A few guys making idiotic jokes amongst themselves about forking and dongle size is now considered harassment? I can understand they were probably being annoying, but I'm having trouble seeing this as harassment.
The pycon people are aiming to build a conference where women don't have to deal with this stuff at all. It's a lofty goal, and I appreciate them for setting a high standard. Excusing little comments creates a culture where women have to put up with innuendo throughout the conference. I saw these people removed from the room, and it was done quite appropriately. (I did not hear anything directly.)
And to me this report seems arguably abusive in the first place, but taken as a whole it amounts to witch hunting and hurts everybody to the benefit of no one.
Now both PyCon, the python community, women in tech and people working towards a more women friendly tech conference have a bad image that's impossible to restore. All because one single person misinterpreted a comment and found a joke not funny, well done !
Re: Forking and Dongle Jokes Don't Belong At Tech Conferences
#114there is no excuse for saying stuff like that at a conference its just not appropriate. but posting their picture on the internet ... there is not any excuse for that either. its just plain wrong.
Or would it make more sense to use IRC chat to talk to the person sitting next to me ?
Re: Forking and Dongle Jokes Don't Belong At Tech Conferences
#115Earlier quoted context omitted.
> A woman reacted by taking a creepshot of them A creepshot by definition is a sexualized photograph, this doesn't count. > publicly shaming them on Twitter Nothing wrong with this. > and getting them kicked out of the room without even trying to simply talk to them When a con attendee violates the rules and con staff wish to pull them aside, that is totally legit. And no, she was under no obligation to explain anyth…
It seems like you're being downvoted pretty heavily. Part of it probably has to do with the views you're expressing, but I think a big part of it is the manner in which you are expressing those views. The former is probably never going to change for you, but the latter could always be changed. > A creepshot by definition is a sexualized photograph, this doesn't count. I think your argument here is being overly dismis…
And I agree that without the twitter post of the picture with the accompanying accusing comment, there would have been no firing involved.
Re: Forking and Dongle Jokes Don't Belong At Tech Conferences
#116Given that it would be trivial to turn around and ask them not to offend, I fail to see the benefit in publicly going after these guys after the fact. Mob justice doesn't allow the other party the ability to alter their behaviour (we don't know if asking would have worked) nor does it allow the other party to tell their side of the story. In addition, it has a habit of causing both sides to dig their heels in and oft…
Adria, and most women, are tired of asking people one by one not to offend. This is her asking everyone to think about what they say in public.
Re: Forking and Dongle Jokes Don't Belong At Tech Conferences
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
The failure was not equally massive on all sides, though. Two guys made possibly juvenile jokes to each other while sitting in the audience at a conference. This was a minor failure of manners. A woman reacted by taking a creepshot of them, publicly shaming them on Twitter, and getting them kicked out of the room without even trying to simply talk to them. Even though she had also been making sexual jokes while at Py…
> A woman reacted by taking a creepshot of them A creepshot by definition is a sexualized photograph, this doesn't count. > publicly shaming them on Twitter Nothing wrong with this. > and getting them kicked out of the room without even trying to simply talk to them When a con attendee violates the rules and con staff wish to pull them aside, that is totally legit. And no, she was under no obligation to explain anyth…
But that assumes women are unable to participate unless they are... well, _protected_ from ever hearing sexual jokes.
No, you may be right that most women perhaps aren't actually asking to be so protected, but some apparently are, and it is their wishes that are being heeded.
Re: Forking and Dongle Jokes Don't Belong At Tech Conferences
#118I am missing something here. I get that someone could be offended by these comments, but what does it have to do with being a woman? I know females who would giggle at such jokes and males who would feel uncomfortable. I feel like the person here being the most sexist is the author, for insinuating that there's something inherent in her gender that makes "forking" jokes offensive to her. I would welcome an explanatio…
There is huge difference between sexual jokes being made among friends and the ones being made by strangers in a professional environment. The latter makes the environment hostile to women. This is not specific to women. You can apply this to minorities (of any shape or form) as well.
Women are just as much sexual beings as men, so why should any talk about sex necessarily "make the environment hostile" to women but not men?!? That could only happen if there were some cultural norm that everyone should pretend that women are actually _not_ just as sexual as men, and then the problem would be _this hypocritical norm_, not the jokes. (Which, as several posters have already pointed out, seems to be exactly the case with US society.)
Actually, come to think of it, a policy to shield women from sexual jokes, in stead of one to encourage them to _make_ sexual jokes themselves, will of course only work to perpetuate this status quo, to reinforce the oppressive norm that "women are poor weak little asexual creatures, whose innocent little rosebud ears must be protected by chivalrous society form ever, ever hearing any innuendo"... THAT is the real sexual oppression here: This stupid policy is in fact _extending_ the (US medieval-style) status quo.
The real feminists here were the dongle-jokers.
Re: Forking and Dongle Jokes Don't Belong At Tech Conferences
#119My 2c: - The conference organizers set a very inclusive mandate that was, perhaps unwittingly, violated. - The blog post author was justified in using social media to alert the organizers that their mandate was being violated, but this probably could have been done privately with a similar effect. - It is extremely unfortunate that the violator's employers fired him. That is a big overreaction on the employer's part.…
Yeah, because an environment where you absolutely dare not make any jokes at all -- "if you wouldn't say it in a court room...", as some other poster said in all apparent sincerity -- sure is going to feel heckuva comfortable to absloutely everyone.
Or, hey, waitaminnit...?