Earlier quoted context omitted.
the original wouldn't have gotten 40 points Everything is interesting to someone and HN doesn't really work strictly by points, you can find explanations of this in lots of the moderator commentary and in the site faq under 'how are stories ranked'. Calling it a "personnel change" is also reading as brazenly disingenuous. That is certainly one exciting reading.
> HN doesn't really work strictly by points People were interested nonetheless. 216 points on this post with 89 comments is pretty conclusive, strict point system or no. > That is certainly one exciting reading. Accurate too.
Lots of things with piles of points and comments are poor HN submissions. Happens all the time and is not in any way conclusive. That's basically the explanation, for there to be some kind of conclusion you'd have to make an argument that isn't about points and comments of a thing that's on the fp. Everything on the fp gets points and comments.