Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Claude 3 model family

anthropic.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

111–120 of 723 posts

Re: Claude 3 model family

#111

Post by Alifatisk »

addandsubtract wrote: post #94
egeozcan wrote: post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

AFAIK there's no strict EU ban but no EU country is listed here: https://www.anthropic.com/claude-ai-locations Perhaps you meant Europe the continent or using a VPN? edit: They seem to have updated that list after I posted my comment, the outdated list I based my comment on: https://web.archive.org/web/20240225034138/https://www.anthr... edit2: I was confused. There is another list for API regions, which has all EU c…

They updated the list of supported countries here: https://www.anthropic.com/supported-countries I was just able to sign up, while not being able to a few weeks ago.

When I go to my account settings, it says my country is invalid haha

Re: Claude 3 model family

#112

Post by michaelt »

nine_k wrote: post #100
anonymouse008 wrote: post #87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm convinced GPT is running separate helper functions on input and output tokens to fix the 'tokenization' issues. As in, find items of math, send it to this hand made parser and function, then insert result into output tokens. There's no other way to fix the token issue. For reference, Let's build the GPT Tokenizer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zduSFxRajkE

I personally find approaches like this the correct way forward. An input analyzer that finds out what kinds of tokens the query contains. A bunch of specialized models which handle each type well: image analysis, OCR, math and formal logic, data lookup,sentiment analysis, etc. Then some synthesis steps that produce a coherent answer in the right format.

Then you might enjoy looking up the "Mixture of Experts" model design.

Re: Claude 3 model family

#113

Post by swalsh »

_sword wrote: post #14

At this point I wonder how much of the GPT-4 advantage has been OpenAI's pre-training data advantage vs. fundamental advancements in theory or engineering. Has OpenAI mastered deep nuances others are missing? Or is their data set large enough that most test-cases are already a sub-set of their pre-training data?

There was a period of time where data was easily accessible, and Open AI suctioned up as much of it as possible. Places have locked the doors since then realizing someone was raiding their pantry.

To get that dataset now would take significantly more expense.

Re: Claude 3 model family

#114

Post by [deleted] »

addandsubtract wrote: post #77
wesleyyue wrote: post #62

Just added Claude 3 to Chat at https://double.bot if anyone wants to try it for coding. Free for now and will push Claude 3 for autocomplete later this afternoon. From my early tests this seems like the first API alternative to GPT4. Huge!

So double is like copilot, but free? What's the catch?

[deleted]

Re: Claude 3 model family

#115

Post by wesleyyue »

behnamoh wrote: post #108
addandsubtract wrote: post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So double is like copilot, but free? What's the catch?

I guess your data is the catch.

We don't store or train on your data. You can see more details on our privacy policy here https://docs.double.bot/legal/privacy

Re: Claude 3 model family

#116

Post by behnamoh »

virgildotcodes wrote: post #68

Just signed up for Claude Pro to try out the Opus model. Decided to throw a complex query at it, combining an image with an involved question about SDXL fine tuning and asking it to do some math comparing the cost of using an RTX 6000 Ada vs an H100. It made a lot of mistakes. I provided it with a screenshot of Runpod's pricing for their GPUs, and it misread the pricing on an RTX 6000 ADA as $0.114 instead of $1.14.…

When OpenAI showed that GPT-4 with vision was smarter than GPT-4 without vision, what did they mean really? Does vision capability increase intelligence even in tasks that don't involve vision (no image input)?

Re: Claude 3 model family

#118

Post by hobofan »

addandsubtract wrote: post #101
spyder wrote: post #99

What's up with the weird list of the supported countries? It isn't available in most European countries (except for Ukraine and UK) but on the other hand lot of African counties are listed... https://www.anthropic.com/claude-ai-locations

This is their updated list of supported countries: https://www.anthropic.com/supported-countries

I think that's not the updated list, but a different list.

https://www.anthropic.com/supported-countries lists all the countries for API access, where they presumably offload a lot more liability to the customers to ensure compliance with local regulations.

https://www.anthropic.com/claude-ai-locations list all supported companies for the ChatGPT-like interface (= end-user product), under claude.ai, for which they can't ensure that they are complying with EU regulations.

Re: Claude 3 model family

#119

Post by behnamoh »

jimbokun wrote: post #93

If you showed someone this article 10 years ago, they would say it indicates Artificial General Intelligence has arrived.

That's the good thing about intelligence: We have no fucking clue how to define it, so the goalpost just keeps moving.

Re: Claude 3 model family

#120

Post by chaostheory »

widerporst wrote: post #9

They claim that the new models "are significantly less likely to refuse to answer prompts that border on the system’s guardrails than previous generations of models", looks like about a third of "incorrect refusals" compared to Claude 2.1. Given that Claude 2 was completely useless because of this, this still feels like a big limitation.

Yeah, no matter how advanced these AIs become, Anthropic’s guardrails make them nearly useless and a waste of time.
Post reply on HN