Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Amazon Prime Video content to start including ads next year

bbc.co.uk

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

111–120 of 335 posts

Re: Amazon Prime Video content to start including ads next year

#111

Post by nemacol »

coldpie wrote: post #101
nemacol wrote: post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In a decade or two when every device has the USB-C instead of 3.5, I will be pretty excited about that. Until then I have to spend my time searching out those dongles.

It's not so bad. Buy a half-dozen dongles, grab a new one from the pile when your current one breaks, and buy another half-dozen when you take the last one from the pile. I find Best Buy's Insignia brand lasts longest. Is it as good a headphone jack? No. But it's not that bad either.

Yeah, it is not the worst thing to deal with. I have adopted this strategy and the end result is I have to spend more money and walk around my house looking for them from time to time. Not terrible.

I'm still mad about it.

Re: Amazon Prime Video content to start including ads next year

#112

Post by MisterTea »

esistgut wrote: post #68
rendall wrote: post #48

I flat out do not watch ads. If a platform has ads, I do not watch it full stop. I pay YouTube for no ads. If I lost that option, I would not watch YouTube. Same with all of the other streaming services. Netflix pushed it last year with preview rolls. It was barely acceptable/tolerable. But I will eagerly jettison any service that makes me pay for ads. Heck, I even look askance at people who willingly pay money to un…

I buy Nike running shoes because they are cheap, durable and comfortable, I don't actually use the to run. The other obvious answer to this question is "because they are status symbols", for some people anyway.

I think the OP was more focused on basic clothing items and accessories like tee shirts with logos.

I would give their running shoes a pass as my downshifters are amazing - they make me want to run - so quite comfortable and functional. A Nike branded shirt or pants however are just decorated cloth.

Re: Amazon Prime Video content to start including ads next year

#113

Post by passwordoops »

mumblemumble wrote: post #67
passwordoops wrote: post #5

So we all cut the cord to get away from restrictive, over-priced packages riddled with ads so we can end up with restrictive, over-priced packages riddled with ads. Say hello to the new boss, I guess

My public library has thousands of DVD. More than I could watch in a lifetime, I think. There's even a bit of streaming. And, outside of the Disney stuff, none of it has ads I can't skip. All free. I mention this and someone always complains that that Game of Mad Men is Breaking the New Black isn't at the library. Which gets me thinking that the real boss might be our own consumerism.

I'm not complaining. My kid loves it - the library has titles that are difficult to find or not in my streaming service du jour, plus she gets exposed to just plain discovery by browsing. Something targeted, personalized suggestions have taken away from us

Re: Amazon Prime Video content to start including ads next year

#114

Post by CaptainZapp »

ilyt wrote: post #89
nblavoie wrote: post #10

And those companies wonder why piracy is back on the rise. We have been duped.

I have no problem paying for content, I pay for Spotify and video games, but I refuse to pay for video until company delivers a non-DRMed video file to my hard drive that I can watch where and how I want. Piracy is a service problem, as Gaben says so it is.

My TV provider allowes me to store up to 2000 hours high definition TV in the cloud.

Combined with 6 movie channels, which show virtually every movie synchronized and in its original language[0] version without ad interruption this setup works for me.

[0] Granted, the original version wasn't too helpful in watching Parasite, which I had to enjoy in the German dub.

Re: Amazon Prime Video content to start including ads next year

#115

Post by dmd »

rendall wrote: post #96
transcriptase wrote: post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Find me an unbranded pair of basketball shorts that will last 10 years, have consistent sizing, and cost less than $20 at an outlet and I’ll gladly buy them. I could gamble on “YAWHOHOMELIFE Men's Running Workout Shorts Training Gym Athletic Joggers Sweat Short Pants Quick Dry Breathable with Zip Pockets”, or pay like $5 more for a little white embroidered check mark and the aforementioned benefits without needing to…

This is a false dichotomy. Your choice is to pay extra for a logo, or pay less for equivalent quality but no logo. You choose logo. Why?

Because, as he said, it's NOT necessarily equivalent quality. Yes, often it is, but also quite often it's utter crap that falls apart.

For these particular type of products - and I'm not claiming this is true in all product categories! - that logo does in fact mean it is a quality, well tested product.

Re: Amazon Prime Video content to start including ads next year

#116

Post by smileysteve »

slowmovintarget wrote: post #16

I'm willing to buy Blu-Rays. I'm also willing to stop watching "content" altogether. I'm already hating the experience of the forced unskippable ads for Paramount shows that play at the beginning (AT MAX VOLUME) of every Paramount+ channel stream (Star Trek... sigh). If I have to watch ads like regular network TV, which I now find unwatchable, I'd just have to do without.

You have "content" in quotes, but during the actors and writers strike, there isn't even "content"

Re: Amazon Prime Video content to start including ads next year

#117

Post by trip-zip »

rendall wrote: post #96
transcriptase wrote: post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Find me an unbranded pair of basketball shorts that will last 10 years, have consistent sizing, and cost less than $20 at an outlet and I’ll gladly buy them. I could gamble on “YAWHOHOMELIFE Men's Running Workout Shorts Training Gym Athletic Joggers Sweat Short Pants Quick Dry Breathable with Zip Pockets”, or pay like $5 more for a little white embroidered check mark and the aforementioned benefits without needing to…

This is a false dichotomy. Your choice is to pay extra for a logo, or pay less for equivalent quality but no logo. You choose logo. Why?

Is your statement not a false dichotomy?

I like 1 particular brand of backpack with a slightly prominent logo on it.

I do not believe there is an equivalent quality made by a brand without the logo I buy.

Re: Amazon Prime Video content to start including ads next year

#118

Post by neilv »

bluescrn wrote: post #72

Gives me a good reason to cancel Prime. Haven't been getting so much value out of free delivery as I'm not buying much physical media any more. Between Prime Video and the occasional delivery, it seemed worth keeping it. But I won't watch a streaming service with ads. Its value to me would be reduced right down to zero.

Yeah, I'm currently paying monthly for Amazon Prime, and every time I think of canceling, I decide that I'm still using Prime Video as my only streaming service.

I experimentally tried the Prime Video "free with ads" content, and there's no way I'm going to tolerate that, much less pay for it.

Oh, besides Amazon's "free with ads" ruining the content experience, and also being a little creepy and making me feel dumber, they recently pulled a whopper of a faux pas: every Prime Video ads break included a commercial for HIV medication. Assuming that ads are somewhat personalized, as many other ads seemed to be, this was startling. I don't have HIV, my doctor would've told me, I'm not at elevated risk, I haven't browsed about it, I haven't searched Amazon for anything I know to correlate, haven't knowingly shared my WiFi, what is Amazon smoking this time, etc. All thoughts I went through. Was I watching a show before that? For entertainment and relaxation?

Just now, I remembered the phrase "Netflix and Chill", and imagined someone getting this barrage of presumably targeted HIV video commercials on their personal Amazon account, on an evening that they had a special someone over. Would that someone persevere until the fourth time the video was interrupted for an extended discussion of HIV medication, before they said, "I'm gonna go now"?

The first of the Amazon Leadership Principles:

> Customer Obsession -- Leaders start with the customer and work backwards. They work vigorously to earn and keep customer trust. Although leaders pay attention to competitors, they obsess over customers.

I don't see how anything about the FreeVee "free with ads" is consistent with the customer's trust. I suspect this and some other recent changes are more like people frittering away others' past long-term investments, in an attempt at short-term returns.

Re: Amazon Prime Video content to start including ads next year

#119

Post by jdbartee »

rendall wrote: post #97
natpalmer1776 wrote: post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For certain items it is part of the cost for the quality of good being procured at a given price point. I’m sure there are no-label options of equal quality and comfort, but the process of finding those options is a much greater (time) cost than the item itself is worth to me. In a different context, if an artisan knows they are the best (by a large margin) and put their mark on every item produced, few seeking the a…

I would understand if the choice were good quality with logo versus questionable crapshoot with no logo. That's not usually the option, though. Perhaps you can't just look at clothing and see whether it is quality or not? Look at the stitching and materials, for instance? I happily pay more for good quality, no-logo than, frankly, logo with middling quality.

Good luck checking out the stitching on Amazon. Even if you can see it in a picture, the item in the picture might not be the one you’re getting.

And good luck finding “no brand” options in a Brick and Mortar store.

Re: Amazon Prime Video content to start including ads next year

#120

Post by seanmcdirmid »

pavlov wrote: post #65
nintendo1889 wrote: post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I adamantly refuse to buy a USB c headset because I'm sure in 2 years there will be a new standard.

USB-C is legally mandated in the EU, and Apple finally switched over their entire lineup. It doesn't seem like it's going anywhere any time soon.

This isn’t exactly true. An industry consensus is demanded in the EU, that just happens to be USB-C ATM. The rules are flexible enough to allow for technology advance, as long as everyone does it all at once.
Post reply on HN