Live data from Hacker News

Apple's A17 Pro Within 10% of i9-13900K, 7950X in Single-Core Performance

tomshardware.com

111–112 of 112 posts

Re: Apple's A17 Pro Within 10% of i9-13900K, 7950X in Single-Core Performance

#111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That sounds overstated. https://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-Ryzen-9-7940HS-analysis-Ze... Current laptop AMD chips have about the same efficiency as M2 Pro, when throttled to similar wattage (see the section about 35W). Instead they default to more power and being more powerful, while being vastly cheaper (M2 Pro Mac mini with 32gb of ram and 2tb of SSD costs what?). So yeah, for a laptop chip apple is ahead, but it is…

??? How is this supported by your article? Looking at the only perf/watt benchmark (Cinebench ST), they show: M2 Pro @ 141 points/watt Ryzen 9 7940HS @ 47 points/watt

> when throttled to similar wattage (see the section about 35W)

Re: Apple's A17 Pro Within 10% of i9-13900K, 7950X in Single-Core Performance

#112
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would suggest you to read this: https://www.antutu.com/en/doc/119646.htm

Isn't this true for literally every cross-platform benchmark? Of course the toolchain, kernel, and graphics API will be different.

No, CPU and memory tests have very little overhead.
Post reply on HN