Live data from Hacker News

Rear-wheel-drive cars are back and we have EVs to thank

thedrive.com

111–120 of 176 posts

Re: Rear-wheel-drive cars are back and we have EVs to thank

#111

I live in a rural mountainous area. FWD cars have a huge advantage over anything RWD: traction going up hill. Nothings funnier than watching delivery trucks going up a giant hill backwards because it's the only way they can maintain traction.

Don't you have that backwards? Maybe at the Apex of a hill, FWD wins; but climbing shifts your weight to the rear.

The only time my FWD Civic struggles is when accelerating uphill in snow.

Re: Rear-wheel-drive cars are back and we have EVs to thank

#112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or used any vehicle with independent front/rear braking like a motorcycle or bike. The rear is for fine tuning while the front is for actually stopping.

Also anyone who has ridden a bicycle.

In that case, leaning back makes a surprising amount of difference.

Re: Rear-wheel-drive cars are back and we have EVs to thank

#113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The front brakes do most of the work. It is not the case, as you assume, that both front and rear contribute equally to braking. If you didn't use the front brakes, or even if you tried to have them apply the same force, the rear wheels would absolutely skid. If you want an extreme visual example, check out stunt cyclists who brake so hard the rear wheel comes off the ground. Pretty easy to see that the rear wheel is…

Bingo. When I was a kid, I once flipped my bike because I was only braking with the front. I learned not to do that, but to an extreme — I then braked almost always with just the back. It wasn't until I got older and faster that I realized that braking just in the back is not as effective, since the braking action makes your nose dive and puts more weight over your front tire. I now brake with both sides, but always…

The trick is to lean your body backward while braking.

Unless you are in a big rush to stop, you can keep the balance pretty even between wheels.

Re: Rear-wheel-drive cars are back and we have EVs to thank

#114
post #82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In the land of the free, you can drive with a parent at 15 and get a license at 16 with zero required classes or real world driving test, with just your parent’s signature, a 70% pass rate on a written test and $25. That’s how I got my license in TX at least. I think this is a bad thing, fwiw. The standards of driver safety training here are incredibly low.

It varies by state, but most of them require either a driving exam or a piece of paper from a drivers education class. Texas is something of an exception in it's general lassie faire posture.

Driving is pretty easy. I was operating heavy farm equipment at 11, and I’m not some sort of mechanical savant.

The maturity to make responsible choices is hard for younger kids. It’s probably smart to set limits to licenses to discourage bad behavior, but be real, some driver testing guy isn’t helping.

Re: Rear-wheel-drive cars are back and we have EVs to thank

#115
post #82
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In Norway, this is basic driver education. The drivers' license there requires "slippery road" training, which involves a more basic version of what you're describing.

In the land of the free, you can drive with a parent at 15 and get a license at 16 with zero required classes or real world driving test, with just your parent’s signature, a 70% pass rate on a written test and $25. That’s how I got my license in TX at least. I think this is a bad thing, fwiw. The standards of driver safety training here are incredibly low.

There is both a driver's training requirement, and a driving test required. The only "Texas" angle, is that parents are allowed to teach the driver's training portion (44 hours of total behind the wheel instruction). You can cheat that, but if you follow the guidelines it is pretty typical level of instruction for most states.

Re: Rear-wheel-drive cars are back and we have EVs to thank

#116
post #82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In the land of the free, you can drive with a parent at 15 and get a license at 16 with zero required classes or real world driving test, with just your parent’s signature, a 70% pass rate on a written test and $25. That’s how I got my license in TX at least. I think this is a bad thing, fwiw. The standards of driver safety training here are incredibly low.

It varies by state, but most of them require either a driving exam or a piece of paper from a drivers education class. Texas is something of an exception in it's general lassie faire posture.

Texas requires drivers ed and drivers training, like most states, as well as a written exam and a driving test to get a license.

Re: Rear-wheel-drive cars are back and we have EVs to thank

#117
post #82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In the land of the free, you can drive with a parent at 15 and get a license at 16 with zero required classes or real world driving test, with just your parent’s signature, a 70% pass rate on a written test and $25. That’s how I got my license in TX at least. I think this is a bad thing, fwiw. The standards of driver safety training here are incredibly low.

It varies by state, but most of them require either a driving exam or a piece of paper from a drivers education class. Texas is something of an exception in it's general lassie faire posture.

Funny enough, after moving back to Texas from out of the country in which my Texas drivers license expired by 6 months, I was required to take both a written AND a practical driving test. Keep in mind I was nearly 40 years old and had a valid Texas license since I was 16.

Re: Rear-wheel-drive cars are back and we have EVs to thank

#119
post #82
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In Norway, this is basic driver education. The drivers' license there requires "slippery road" training, which involves a more basic version of what you're describing.

In the land of the free, you can drive with a parent at 15 and get a license at 16 with zero required classes or real world driving test, with just your parent’s signature, a 70% pass rate on a written test and $25. That’s how I got my license in TX at least. I think this is a bad thing, fwiw. The standards of driver safety training here are incredibly low.

We NEED to drive in the US. You can’t make it strict or else we’d kick millions out of the economy.
Post reply on HN