Live data from Hacker News

The American Healthcare Conundrum

github.com

101–110 of 690 posts

Re: The American Healthcare Conundrum

#101
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We rarely discuss the primary source of health care cost differences in the United States -- US doctors get paid a lot more than elsewhere. I haven't seen a credible proposal to address that. Most of the salary difference can be blamed on deliberately created shortages of doctors in many specialities. Not enough medical school slots (horror stories among my kid's friends of not getting accepted) and then also shortag…

I really don’t think doctor salaries are the primary difference when they make up less than 10 % of health care costs: > However, new research by Stanford health economist Maria Polyakova and colleagues — using unique data on physician income — shows that physicians’ personal earnings account for only 8.6 percent of national health-care spending https://siepr.stanford.edu/news/just-how-much-do-physicians-...

This is a more comprehensive survey that’s light on methods but from a respected industry watcher with similar conclusions:

https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2...

Re: The American Healthcare Conundrum

#102
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I will piggy back off of your comment because I was going to say a very similar thing. In my state, electric utilities are guaranteed a rate of return on investment of approximately 12%, if I remember correctly. And so there's a lot of incentive for build out and maintenance that's high in total dollar amount and high in volume of work done. In some ways it's the system working as designed but the "cap" can incentivi…

So you have an excessively built out electrical system... sounds like a win to me.

I'm sure it sounds good to you as long as it's OPM

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Averch%E2%80%93Johnson_effect

Re: The American Healthcare Conundrum

#103

Lots of people are saying nonsense here. The actual reason commercial insurers pay more is that's the only way to can make more profits. Because of Obamacare requiring 80% of the money they collect to be spent, the insurance companies just get to keep 20%. So insurance companies spend more so they can collect higher premiums. That's how they make more money. Several doctor friends have told me this as well.

There are other structural issues at work that you see across US government procurement generally, Medicare just being one example. The unit costs of doing business with the US government are higher than with private companies even after accounting for economies of scale. The US government also requires that they pay the lowest price. Consequently, unit economics are usually worse when dealing with the government tha…

I'd argue it's a subsidy/incentive problem. Since every subsidy works by raising a cost somewhere which is used to subsidize a cost elsewhere, I'm inclined to believe in the Bennett hypothesis. Our government mostly subsidizes demand, and does little to incentivize productivity/outcomes. You see high prices everywhere the government funnels money: in education, healthcare, even the military - as where's the incentive to lower costs if the government is on the hook and will fund it no matter the cost?

Re: The American Healthcare Conundrum

#104
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I will piggy back off of your comment because I was going to say a very similar thing. In my state, electric utilities are guaranteed a rate of return on investment of approximately 12%, if I remember correctly. And so there's a lot of incentive for build out and maintenance that's high in total dollar amount and high in volume of work done. In some ways it's the system working as designed but the "cap" can incentivi…

So you have an excessively built out electrical system... sounds like a win to me.

They said excessively expensive, not excessively robust. There is a difference.

Re: The American Healthcare Conundrum

#105
post #49
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> part of the healthcare system that is moderately competitive. That’s only half the story though insurance companies also try and reject way more claims, cover fewer people, and are just harder to get money from than Medicare. This means hospitals can’t afford to give them cheaper rates as they just require vastly more work from staff for the same procedure. The industry isn’t blind to this effect, but has little re…

That's true to an extent, and those minimal controls are why Medicare also wastes billions on paying fraudulent claims. https://relentlesshealthvalue.com/episode/ep502-how-some-pre...

They waste billions on fraudulent claims because they don't fund the program well enough to have compliance enforcement or auditing.

Also, I'm not going to trust a podcast owned and operated by Stacey Richter, who also just so happens to be the co-president of Aventria Health Group and QC-Health.

Re: The American Healthcare Conundrum

#106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

ACA enshrined the worst parts of the American healthcare system for years to come. It is a politicized victory that is the best solution for no American citizens. Places I’ve been with fully privatized healthcare or single payer are both significantly better for consumers. Insurance companies have raised prices to restore profit, were briefly a mandatory expense, and will exist for years to come.

> ACA enshrined the worst parts of the American healthcare system for years to come before the ACA, insurers could deny coverage for pre-existing conditions people have forgotten how bad things used to be

We traded the cruelty of Exclusion for the cruelty of Extraction.

Re: The American Healthcare Conundrum

#107

Earlier quoted context omitted.

ACA enshrined the worst parts of the American healthcare system for years to come. It is a politicized victory that is the best solution for no American citizens. Places I’ve been with fully privatized healthcare or single payer are both significantly better for consumers. Insurance companies have raised prices to restore profit, were briefly a mandatory expense, and will exist for years to come.

> ACA enshrined the worst parts of the American healthcare system for years to come before the ACA, insurers could deny coverage for pre-existing conditions people have forgotten how bad things used to be

[deleted]

Re: The American Healthcare Conundrum

#109
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Price caps always and everywhere cause shortages, including long queues for certain types of care. This may be acceptable but we need to understand the trade-offs when making any changes.

Price caps create shortages when they are the rate limiting factor, which is always the case when imposed on a free market whenever the cap is below the market price, so this is an extremely accurate statement when dealing with things like lightly regulated commodities. Whether they would be the rate limiting factor in health care remain to be seen, since health care is highly regulated with regulatory capture, licen…

You don't need to waste time with though experiments, you can just look around at various national healthcare systems. Wherever there are price caps, certain treatments have long queues or are simply not available at all. That's why affluent Canadians often come to the USA as medical tourists and pay cash for MRI scans or joint replacement surgery. Every system rations care somehow and price caps aren't necessarily the worst way to do it so let's just be real about the consequences.

Re: The American Healthcare Conundrum

#110
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's true to an extent, and those minimal controls are why Medicare also wastes billions on paying fraudulent claims. https://relentlesshealthvalue.com/episode/ep502-how-some-pre...

They waste billions on fraudulent claims because they don't fund the program well enough to have compliance enforcement or auditing. Also, I'm not going to trust a podcast owned and operated by Stacey Richter, who also just so happens to be the co-president of Aventria Health Group and QC-Health.

Trust is irrelevant. You can verify all of the statements made by Brian Machut on that podcast with independent sources if you like.
Post reply on HN