Live data from Hacker News

Amazon’s Ring to partner with Flock

techcrunch.com

101–110 of 531 posts

Re: Amazon’s Ring to partner with Flock

#101

Everybody is a libertarian when their political opposition has power.

The corollary is that, when in power, many "libertarians" are only concerned with their own rights and nobody else's, failing to understand that any rights they give up for others may soon be lost for them too.

It's just the brown people who are put in detention centers, isn't it?

Re: Amazon’s Ring to partner with Flock

#102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In reality - I think this will be far worse than that. Why send in an expensive soldiers or a cop when you could just filter in a drone

"Just trust us, the people on that boat were definitely smuggling drugs."

"Just trust us" ... said the people who constantly instigate conflicts and wars and orchestrate and perpetrate false-flag operations to then claim they had to attack and murder people.

What the public does not understand though is that THEIR complicity and facilitation is not only integral, it is even necessary in a "democracy" where a psychological "consent" must be manufactured, not dissimilar to basic grooming tactics. And no, it's no coincidence that all the western leadership and institutions are effectively all various types of groomers, i.e., psychological manipulators and abusers.

Re: Amazon’s Ring to partner with Flock

#103

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If history has thought us anything, it has to be that capitalists have absolutely no spine and only think about profits, no matter what.

It's the government that wants unchecked power, no matter what. This is why people support the 2A, and why it was the 2nd most important thing to those who founded the country.

The same 2nd amendment from 1791 when the most firepower a government could have were cannons shooting round cannonballs?

Surely in 2025 a ragtag group of people with some revolvers, pistols, hunting rifles, and a small minority owning assault rifles, with limited ammo will be able to fight against the most well-funded armed force with tanks, IFVs, assault helicopters, aircrafts, missiles, rockets, and military infantry armed to the gills wearing NVGs.

People who think 2A will do anything in case your government actually turns violent on you are just trying to maintain the illusion of control.

Re: Amazon’s Ring to partner with Flock

#104
post #67
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh, Jesus!! This f shameless pretention of doing something noble - barely helpful above normal practices btw. - while manipulating clueless users into turning on mass-surveillance is revolting and disgusting. And ordinary employees figured this out, phrased, created content, implemmented, pubished, and are maintaining this dirty practice. Many times with (very misplaced) pride. Shame on all of them actively participa…

I have a Ring. I got the email notifying me and was about to go disable it, but it doesn’t share anything. It says it will notify you that your camera detected the dog and then YOU choose to share the video or not. So I left it enabled, as it becomes a later choice. Effectively I’m not opted into sharing was my take.

But you’re opted into the automatic detection, regardless. Ring is still processing your video still to see if there’s a match to any Search Party unless you turn the feature off.

At what point will the police request a warrant to run their own Search Party without consent?

Re: Amazon’s Ring to partner with Flock

#105
post #85

This is why I never bought anything Amazon owned, other than Kindles; and I have dropped the latter, too. I was always suspicious of Ring and never understood the people using it.

My entire neighborhood came with ring doorbells pre installed and eero routers.

I swapped out to the Logitech doorbell which I like better anyway

Re: Amazon’s Ring to partner with Flock

#107
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have deniability with the phone. I can also just leave it at home if I want or turn it off entirely. That access should also be illegal without a warrant; however, this is far worse than cellular "metadata" tracking.

> or turn it off entirely That part you can't do. Unless the battery is removed, phone can be turned back on remotely.

Pull SIM card?

Re: Amazon’s Ring to partner with Flock

#108
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Absolutely, I will be running PoE wherever possible, definitely for the doorbell. Not just because of Amazon drivers, I've read reports of burglars using WiFi jammers to make sure wireless cameras are useless during a break-in.

Cops will also go after your networking prior to busting down your door. Same applies regardless of a correct and valid warrant so do with that as you will. I'm sure the cops who trashed Afroman's place would have loved that ability.

I realize that if the authorities target me specifically, there's not much I can do. Even though I am not in the States and do not expect my local police to be quite as... forceful.

However, I do not intend to make it easy to just grab my footage along with any other that can be found, without at least asking.

Re: Amazon’s Ring to partner with Flock

#109
post #76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

citation needed

https://www.idownloadblog.com/2021/12/16/ios-15-2-power-rese... They can do it right up until the battery truly discharges. You can’t turn off WiFi/BT for real either. Icons will go dark and your WiFi and devices won’t work, but underneath the radios are still plenty active and powered on.

The Faraday cage wallet it is then.

Re: Amazon’s Ring to partner with Flock

#110
post #92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Many people (including in this website) are hard at work creating the torment nexus.

No doubt. The question is, is that the explicit goal, and if so, why? And if not, don't they consider the effects of their actions, if they aren't, why?

The torment nexus is very interesting from a research standpoint and very profitable for investors. There's many military and industrial applications.
Post reply on HN