Live data from Hacker News

Telegram has launched a pretty intense campaign to malign Signal as insecure

twitter.com

101–110 of 501 posts

Re: Telegram has launched a pretty intense campaign to malign Signal as insecure

#101
post #56

For more context, here are some of the references related to this thread: > Pavel Durov, the CEO of Telegram, has recently been making a big conspiracy push to promote Telegram as more secure than Signal.. https://t.me/durov/274 Jack Dorsey's Tweet: https://twitter.com/jack/status/1787895769183268948

[deleted]

Re: Telegram has launched a pretty intense campaign to malign Signal as insecure

#102
post #87

To quote one comment (Phillip.png): "With assistance from Elon Musk" is a pretty big accusation. I held off replying until I read your whole thread, and then you didn't mention that at all. What the hell?" Seriously, what the heck has Elon Musk to do with this? Unless we also want to debate what we all think of Elon Musk when we talk about chat protocols?

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1787908190799278360

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1787589564917490059

Keep in mind that X/Twitter's "For You" algo boosts posts to which Elon replies in his followers' feeds.

Re: Telegram has launched a pretty intense campaign to malign Signal as insecure

#103
post #83

I don't know about Telegram being nasty towards Signal but Signal brought this upon themselves. Metadata are more important than the content of the messages and yet Signal has always been about knowing your phone number, with handwaving when the subject is mentioned. Sessions, a Signal fork, had its tagline right: "Share encrypted messages, not metadata" . Signal is a metadata exchanging app and it's about collecting…

Not sure if metadata is more important but ok. Signal has launched support to use nicknames instead of phone numbers although it's true this took a long time. I think Telegram is very wide-spread for running large group chats and communities, a use case that Signal is not interested in. Personally, I want my chats end to end encrypted and I'm grateful to Signal for pioneering this and inspiring Whatsapp, facebook mes…

> Signal has launched support to use nicknames instead of phone numbers

You will still need a phone number to sign up for Signal. Signal still knows your phone number, you just hide it from your contacts. To me this only makes it even more suspicious.

Re: Telegram has launched a pretty intense campaign to malign Signal as insecure

#104
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I use it since 2014 and have felt that it's very performant (more so than Signal or Whatsapp, Messenger, or Viber). Also, it adds many useful features that other messengers didn't always have and many still don't have, for example Saved Messages, Scheduled Messages, Spoiler Messages, Reply to Message, message formatting (bold, monospace, etc), just to name a few off the top of my head.

Signal has "Scheduled Messages, Spoiler Messages, Reply to Message, message formatting (bold, monospace, etc)". I don't know what Saved Messages are, maybe it doesn't have those. Oh, and it's end-to-end encrypted by default.

It does, in Signal it's called "Note to Self". I am saying that in general, Telegram is the first to offer such new feautres.

Re: Telegram has launched a pretty intense campaign to malign Signal as insecure

#105
post #83

I don't know about Telegram being nasty towards Signal but Signal brought this upon themselves. Metadata are more important than the content of the messages and yet Signal has always been about knowing your phone number, with handwaving when the subject is mentioned. Sessions, a Signal fork, had its tagline right: "Share encrypted messages, not metadata" . Signal is a metadata exchanging app and it's about collecting…

Not sure if metadata is more important but ok. Signal has launched support to use nicknames instead of phone numbers although it's true this took a long time. I think Telegram is very wide-spread for running large group chats and communities, a use case that Signal is not interested in. Personally, I want my chats end to end encrypted and I'm grateful to Signal for pioneering this and inspiring Whatsapp, facebook mes…

People has been killed based on metadata https://www.nybooks.com/online/2014/05/10/we-kill-people-bas...

Re: Telegram has launched a pretty intense campaign to malign Signal as insecure

#106
post #9

https://nitter.poast.org/matthew_d_green/status/178968789886...

Ah so that's how Telegram got reproducible iOS builds:

> you need a jailbroken (old) iPhone. And at the end you still can’t verify the whole app. Some files stay encrypted

So basically, it works you just have to bend over backwards to verify that it's truly reproducible.

Re: Telegram has launched a pretty intense campaign to malign Signal as insecure

#107
post #74

You can download Telegram and many forked clients from F-Droid. All the builds are from source code, so you know the source code is up-to-date. Any distro can have Telegram clients, both official and third-party, in their repository. Compared to this 1. You cannot download Signal from F-Droid. You need to download it from the Google Play Store. The released source code has lagged behind the version on the Google Play…

All true. But where are the sources of Telegram server? They are not open source, simply! What are they actually doing with our messages? Only they know. And they can read them because by default there's no E2E encryption.

Re: Telegram has launched a pretty intense campaign to malign Signal as insecure

#108

I don't know about Telegram being nasty towards Signal but Signal brought this upon themselves. Metadata are more important than the content of the messages and yet Signal has always been about knowing your phone number, with handwaving when the subject is mentioned. Sessions, a Signal fork, had its tagline right: "Share encrypted messages, not metadata" . Signal is a metadata exchanging app and it's about collecting…

[flagged]

Re: Telegram has launched a pretty intense campaign to malign Signal as insecure

#109

I don't know about Telegram being nasty towards Signal but Signal brought this upon themselves. Metadata are more important than the content of the messages and yet Signal has always been about knowing your phone number, with handwaving when the subject is mentioned. Sessions, a Signal fork, had its tagline right: "Share encrypted messages, not metadata" . Signal is a metadata exchanging app and it's about collecting…

As of a few weeks ago, you can hide your phone number on Signal, and it's even the default, even for existing accounts. You can even opt in to disable discovery by someone who already knows your number.[0]

> To me Telegram is going after WhatsApp, not Signal.

They mention Signal by name in the referenced post.

[0] https://signal.org/blog/phone-number-privacy-usernames/

Re: Telegram has launched a pretty intense campaign to malign Signal as insecure

#110
post #9

https://nitter.poast.org/matthew_d_green/status/178968789886...

A nitter instance that still works? What is this sorcery?

Nitter still works if you configure the instance to use valid accounts.
Post reply on HN