Live data from Hacker News

The EU’s fight for user-replaceable smartphone batteries

theverge.com

101–110 of 334 posts

Re: The EU’s fight for user-replaceable smartphone batteries

#101
post #82
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's not great - those devices really do not have space for a replaceable battery. And no, I don't want them bigger than they already are.

There’s certainly some compromises to be made for sustainability, but I don’t think they have to be a deal breaker.

As long as it has any impact on weight, battery size, water tightness or make the device bigger its a deal breaker for me.

Re: The EU’s fight for user-replaceable smartphone batteries

#103
post #86
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you discharge the battery first it won’t catch on fire if you puncture or overheat it.. so, don’t replace a fully charged battery and you should be fine.

Yes. But you don't expect everyone to do that, when you think about safety. You assume the worst, not the best.

If we can’t expect people to be safe with accessing batteries we should make the batteries less accessible, not more accessible.

Re: The EU’s fight for user-replaceable smartphone batteries

#104
post #9

Iphone battery is already pretty close to replaceable by this law. You need a common tool to get in (trident screwdriver is available in most DIY shops), then glue tabs can be pried by hand. Doable for layman? Well, some people are afraid of opening up a device in any way. How do we (or, rather, lawyers) draw a line?

> How do we (or, rather, lawyers) draw a line?

That’s literally what courts do.

Re: The EU’s fight for user-replaceable smartphone batteries

#105
post #4

I think this is fantastic news. It will be interesting to see how it affects the amount of phones that get discarded. I think the next bottleneck is likely to be software longevity. This has improved a lot lately! But basically I think phones have now reached a place like laptops and desktops where HW capabilities are stable, and there's no good reason for devices to be obsolete in 5 years any more. I wonder if regul…

> But basically I think phones have now reached a place like laptops and desktops where HW capabilities are stable, and there's no good reason for devices to be obsolete in 5 years any more.

Unless you care about your phone working as a phone. 2G was discontinued years ago, 3G is rapidly being dropped by the carriers and how much longer before 4G is discontinued?

> streamlining the Android update process? (To Google's credit they have already done a _lot_ of positive work in that area as I understand it).

What exactly is Google doing? Apple released a security update for the 2013 iPhone 5s earlier this year.

Re: The EU’s fight for user-replaceable smartphone batteries

#106
post #9

Iphone battery is already pretty close to replaceable by this law. You need a common tool to get in (trident screwdriver is available in most DIY shops), then glue tabs can be pried by hand. Doable for layman? Well, some people are afraid of opening up a device in any way. How do we (or, rather, lawyers) draw a line?

> Doable for layman? Well, some people are afraid of opening up a device in any way. How do we (or, rather, lawyers) draw a line? Start by not requiring a screwdriver in the process of changing batteries. I remember the early days of Samsung/Android phones where you only needed to pry open the back cover using your nail and the battery was easily taken out. It's a small change but the layman will be way less afraid.

That’s not part of the law, and it absolutely shouldn’t be.

Re: The EU’s fight for user-replaceable smartphone batteries

#107

It is interesting that the EU only wants to regulate markets that they are not participating in. They don't make smartphone anymore so any regulations isn't hurting them. It would be admirable if they held the same standard for vehicles, including brands from the EU.

> It would be admirable if they held the same standard for vehicles, including brands from the EU

This regulation does cover vehicles.

It also covers a wide range of devices, including ones that are indeed made by the EU.

Beyond that, I think "only regulate things you make" is a silly standard. The point of regulations are (or should be) to protect consumers, not to disadvantage companies. The EU has lots of consumers who buy smartphones and thus has a very legitimate reason to want to regulate them to protect their consumers.

Re: The EU’s fight for user-replaceable smartphone batteries

#108
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is it? It is going to meant that Android can't take advantage of the high end features of the new phones that are being released, and that old and slow phones are going to get updates that makes them run even slower. To top it of, it is not like manufacturers are into throwing away money, so this will likely mean that prices on the cheapest phones will increase more.

This is great because the more expensive phones get, the less likely people will want to replace their 2-year old phone with a new one. Plus, those new high end features...there have been barely any new features in a smartphone in the last 5+ years (I'm exaggerating a bit of course). Check out Fairphone. That's an interesting project!

Isn’t this the ultimate “let them eat cake” argument? There are many people in the world who can’t afford anything but the cheapest phone.

Re: The EU’s fight for user-replaceable smartphone batteries

#109
post #4

I think this is fantastic news. It will be interesting to see how it affects the amount of phones that get discarded. I think the next bottleneck is likely to be software longevity. This has improved a lot lately! But basically I think phones have now reached a place like laptops and desktops where HW capabilities are stable, and there's no good reason for devices to be obsolete in 5 years any more. I wonder if regul…

> But basically I think phones have now reached a place like laptops and desktops where HW capabilities are stable, and there's no good reason for devices to be obsolete in 5 years any more. Unless you care about your phone working as a phone. 2G was discontinued years ago, 3G is rapidly being dropped by the carriers and how much longer before 4G is discontinued? > streamlining the Android update process? (To Google'…

Even in your example you point out that 3G "is being rapidly dropped" but it's not dead yet. The iPhone 3G came out in 2008. So just today, 15 years later, it would still work on most networks (certainly I can still use 3G in Australia).

Re: The EU’s fight for user-replaceable smartphone batteries

#110

The battery is indeed the HW part that has the most decay. But in that 5y time-frame the SW part is the one that is the most problematic. It would be nice to be able to replace the ROM easily after the EOL of the device. Will self-regulate itself immediately, as then incentives to have longer life is real and you cannot force customers to just buy another device because you decided it's time. By "replace ROM easily"…

Is ROM really used anymore? It seems like these days, everything is OTA update compatible.

Customers aren’t forced to buy new devices, they just no longer get software updates after N (5?) years. You would need an alternative OS, like a version of Android that lacks google apps or something.

Post reply on HN