Earlier quoted context omitted.
> In the real world, sure. Can you point at one? A council with "widely diverse viewpoints" that is actually an effective, tie-braking decision maker?
Supreme Court justices, despite their huge partisan differences and passionate disagreements on many individual cases, often talk about how they personally enjoy working with each other. My impression is that this is true of many Congressional committees as well, although it's less legible there because most congressmembers find it politically advantageous to talk about how mad they are at the other party.
“Twitter will be forming a content moderation council with diverse viewpoints”
101–110 of 1001 posts
Re: “Twitter will be forming a content moderation council with diverse viewpoints”
#102Re: “Twitter will be forming a content moderation council with diverse viewpoints”
#103Borrowing the best failed ideas of Mark Zuckerberg https://radiolab.org/episodes/facebooks-supreme-court
Re: “Twitter will be forming a content moderation council with diverse viewpoints”
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm surprised because I thought there was a passionate but healthy debate about the matter, unlike what you'd see on Twitter or Reddit. A lot of opinions were expressed but I didn't see anybody calling out names, using epithets, shutting people down, etc. HN's treatment of controversial topics generally is more respectful than elsewhere, which is why it is disappointing to see them shut down or buried here, when much…
Shutting down discussions when they start to get disrespectful is what ensures that you only see respectful discussions here.
Re: “Twitter will be forming a content moderation council with diverse viewpoints”
#105Earlier quoted context omitted.
At least in the US, there's a lot of noxious speech that's legal. The US has very permissive free speech laws overall.
And conversely the US is one of the most restrictive nations on earth when it comes to speech that supposedly infringes Copyrights or can be interpreted as defamation/slander. The premise that US has anything resembling freedom of speech is completely untrue.
Re: “Twitter will be forming a content moderation council with diverse viewpoints”
#106Re: “Twitter will be forming a content moderation council with diverse viewpoints”
#107It would be amazing if a council with diverse viewpoints could even sit together without killing each other in this day and age. Does this exist anywhere?
Yes, this is how social interaction in the real world, or even smaller online communities, has worked for ages. It's only on pseudonymous mega-sites like Twitter, Reddit and HN where jumping down people's throats for having an opposing viewpoint is even a thing.
Re: “Twitter will be forming a content moderation council with diverse viewpoints”
#108The problem if living conditions don't improve, things get extreme regardless.
Re: “Twitter will be forming a content moderation council with diverse viewpoints”
#109Quoted post unavailable.
So anyone that is celebrating this Musk announcement is telling on themselves This is exactly the sort of tone that improving balance is intended to counter.
Re: “Twitter will be forming a content moderation council with diverse viewpoints”
#110Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The Internet would have us believe that civil war is imminent. The person who could arguably be considered the third most powerful politician in the US just had their own broken into and their spouse assaulted in a suspected act of domestic terrorism. I wouldn't say "imminent" but if you don't think the possibility is at least somewhere on the table I would consider that being naive.
And you've got MAGA "prophets" out there "prophesying" about the "Angel of Death" visiting their political opponents before the end of 2022.