Live data from Hacker News

A clip from Stray got me banned from Twitter

fanbyte.com

101–110 of 577 posts

Re: A clip from Stray got me banned from Twitter

#101

I'm in Thailand and just get this message: We've discontinued servicing users from your location and are thereby preventing access to any of the websites owned and operated by ZAM Network, LLC DBA Fanbyte (the owner of Fanbyte.com): This decision is ultimately one we were forced to make due to the number of visitors from your region when compared to the operational costs necessary to continue providing access there.…

I hit a very similar message several times when I was traveling in Colombia, including on websites that I specifically needed to access to plan my further travel. It's extremely annoying. I suspect there is some button on Wix or a WordPress plugin that webmasters are naively using to fight spam that's inadvertently locking out legitimate users from certain countries.

It's a really big step backwards for the idea of a "world wide web" and global internet, imo, and plays right into the hands of authoritarian nations who are trying to sell developing countries on the idea of "internet sovereignty".

Re: A clip from Stray got me banned from Twitter

#102
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’m ex Facebook software engineer (even had selfie with Zuckerberg as the avatar picture) who got banned on Facebook. Up to this day I have no clue what for. But it’s extremely annoying because I lost lots of photos that I didn’t back up and close to thousand contracts of people. Users should definitely own this data, not a corporation.

Quoted post unavailable.

This was uncalled for man.

Re: A clip from Stray got me banned from Twitter

#103

I'm in Thailand and just get this message: We've discontinued servicing users from your location and are thereby preventing access to any of the websites owned and operated by ZAM Network, LLC DBA Fanbyte (the owner of Fanbyte.com): This decision is ultimately one we were forced to make due to the number of visitors from your region when compared to the operational costs necessary to continue providing access there.…

So they host articles that complain about being banned on Twitter, but are ok with banning entire countries?

Re: A clip from Stray got me banned from Twitter

#104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> And what’s more, you can still read them if you’re banned. That is changing and in many places already no longer true.

Such as?

Also FB private groups that may be of interest to the user.

For example many football club-related groups are private for obvious reasons, and, as such, getting kicked out of FB also means getting kicked out of your local supporters' forum where the online discussions happen. Yes, people from that group also meet irl, but not all of them attend those meetings and those meetings happen, at most, once every week (after the football season starts). For example we're out-season now but this is also the time of some of the most heated and interesting discussions, because right now we're in the middle of the transfer season.

Re: A clip from Stray got me banned from Twitter

#105
post #94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> How do you prevent someone from copying your RSS and making it their RSS? Where is the proof that you published it first? How do you prevent someone from minting their own NFT using your NFT's underlying image file? You could rely on a third-party centralized search engine which looks at the actual content to determine which one appeared first, and the same would apply to RSS.

Many people are laughing at the whole NFT thing right now but I suspect that in 10-15 years people will be laughing even harder when the whole thing collapses. Yeah you got stuff in a blockchain, but the "stuff" you put in there is a mere link to a service which might not survive so long (most services don't). So yeah in 10-15 years you'll probably have a lot of former nft owners that only own a broken link (or possi…

Bold thinking NFTs will make it more than 5 years

Re: A clip from Stray got me banned from Twitter

#106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That’s a very naive argument. If your friends and family are on Facebook, your work contacts across the country are on Twitter, the only forums left alive on the web are on Reddit, how can you not need them? These things have replaced existing connections you used to have via other channels. You can not step away without severing them now, it is no longer a matter of personal choice.

In what world are people only able to communicate with their family and friends on Facebook? Who only communicates with colleagues over Twitter?

In the world we live in now.

I knew a guy who was having serious financial trouble, and couldn’t afford to keep a phone line active. He relied on Facebook to stay in contact with his wife and son because he at least had access to WiFi.

You can make a similar argument about phones. People can just reach each other via mail, or physically visit each other…but this doesn’t exactly constitute a healthy state of interaction.

Use email you say! Almost every big email provider requires verification via phone or another email address these days.

It’s legitimately getting harder and harder to communicate in these other ways.

> Who only communicates with colleagues over Twitter?

I don’t use Twitter much these days, but for a period of time, it was by far the easiest way to get/stay in touch with the communities I was organizing. I did dev advocacy, and if I ran a meet up somewhere, I didn’t want to just hand my phone number to a room full of people, but did want the option to stay in contact.

Could I have found another solution? Yeah sure. But at the time, this seems pretty reasonable, and Twitter wasn’t yet banning people for inane things.

If I lost that account now, it’d sever an entire community. Could I work around that? Sure.

But downplaying the significance of these things seems short sighted.

I rarely touch social media these days for many other reasons, but that is definitely an isolating choice to make in 2022.

Re: A clip from Stray got me banned from Twitter

#107
This is far from the main discussion, but I used to be a "stinker" like the author describes, and I have a touch of unsolicited advice. Life is much happier if you save your obstinate streak for very limited, important occasions. Otherwise, you live your life ensnared in the negativity of trivial violations of your personal expectations about values and behavior.

Re: A clip from Stray got me banned from Twitter

#108

This is how big tech does damage to humans. Love it or hate it, the online world is our current public square. A public square, in the united states, has typically been an area where people can shout out their concerns or whatever they want to anyone who can listen and the government cannot stop it. Currently, our public squares are owned by private megacorporations that not only ban people for reasons many people ag…

There are many "public squares" in the world owned by corporations -- 592 in New York City alone including 168 plazas. They don't have the same protections for their users that a true public square has, but they're cheaper for the average voter, and that's what we care about.

Re: A clip from Stray got me banned from Twitter

#109
> Overnight, I received a response that my appeal had been denied. So a human being, someone who works at Twitter dot com, looked at that video, looked back at the rule it was breaking, looked once again at the video, and went “Yeah, this all checks out.”

Of course not. "Appeals" are certainly not reviewed by human beings; maybe by another AI, or more probably by the same AI with higher thresholds. This is all automated stupidity.

Twitter does have a "bot problem", except that the bots are inside, not outside.

Re: A clip from Stray got me banned from Twitter

#110

I'm in Thailand and just get this message: We've discontinued servicing users from your location and are thereby preventing access to any of the websites owned and operated by ZAM Network, LLC DBA Fanbyte (the owner of Fanbyte.com): This decision is ultimately one we were forced to make due to the number of visitors from your region when compared to the operational costs necessary to continue providing access there.…

From https://eu.forums.blizzard.com/en/wow/t/a-good-tip-for-peopl...

The following countries have been blocked from accessing any of the websites owned and operated by ZAM Network, LLC DBA Fanbyte (the owner of Wowhead. com):

China Indonesia Philippines Thailand Turkey Serbia India This decision is ultimately due to legal compliance and liability issues with respect to these countries and their laws/regulations. This action was not based on any specific law or regulation in any one or more of the listed countries. Our decision was due to the legal costs involved with reviewing the laws and regulations of the listed countries, in contrast with the amount of visitors/revenue earned from them. As a result of this analysis, we decided not to pursue a legal review and to mitigate our liability in these countries, we opted to block access entirely. This is an indefinite decision. I and the rest of the Wowhead staff genuinely apologize for the inconvenience this will cause you. It was a tough decision but one that we ultimately had to accept.

Post reply on HN