101–110 of 409 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The problem is that there are very few viable distribution channels that we are forced to rely on companies like Google. What other viable choices does this site have aside from Google?
Well, if there were no Google-like companies, what would this site do?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Start embedding links in the text of your old content that point to your new content (when contextually appropriate, of course). Not as warnings, but if for some reason you mention a topic or word that's relevant to a newer article...
Thanks for the tip, will try that where appropriate content relationships exist, but suspect it's minor occurrences (when you blog for 20+ years, your output varies considerably in terms of topics over time!). Google does not like my new topics it seems, starting around 2012, but thankfully unlike the OP who I have a lot of sympathy for, my blog is for fun and not livelihood. We write for bots, so they can decide to…
Seems like something a Jekyll or Hugo plugin could do quite well.
This site looks like typical review spam. Why should Google index a site with single paragraph blurbs taken from product descriptions? Despite his effort level, there is no differentiation from the sites doing the same with ML and third world labor.
This is one of several posts I've seen on HN lately following a similar trend: sudden and unexpected drops in search engine traffic. On the one hand it must be jarring to suddenly have a drop in traffic. But is it necessarily indicative of a bad administration of a search engine? Popularity of sites shift. People's tastes change. Even without an algorithm change we would not expect search traffic to remain constant.…
Those whose traffic benefit from these changes attribute it to their outstanding abilities as an internet entrepreneur.
Those whose traffic suffer write blog posts like this one.
It sucks for this guy, but this is just how search engines work.
This is one of several posts I've seen on HN lately following a similar trend: sudden and unexpected drops in search engine traffic. On the one hand it must be jarring to suddenly have a drop in traffic. But is it necessarily indicative of a bad administration of a search engine? Popularity of sites shift. People's tastes change. Even without an algorithm change we would not expect search traffic to remain constant.…
You’re saying that user preference shifted, but in reality, Google’s preference shifted. That, to me, is the problem highlighted by this story and others.
Once again HN gets baited into sending massive traffic into an affiliate link farm! Adding this particular tactic into my repertoire of headlines
I’ve had similar experiences with other google products: My mom forgot her gmail password and no longer had the same mobile number for a reset, the secondary reset option was set to my email but would not send a reset despite this. We had a live session via thunderbird but there were no channels of support. Luckily we were able to register her old mobile number to achieve a password reset, thanks to a helpful phone p…
I've seen this before too. A huge problem right now is the massive tech companies want an unreasonable view into your life. They want your identity, phone number, photo id, location history, credit history, etc. before they'll treat you like a real person.
If you think I'm joking, spin up a transient environment, connect to a VPN, and try to participate online without linking all of your accounts to a piece of real world identity information that, in turn, can be linked to all the other things I listed above. You can't even get an email address without a phone number.
Part of the issue there is the huge tech companies are abusing their market positions to assign bad reputation to the IP blocks owned by everyone else. You can't use a VPS for ANYTHING but incoming connections because the IPs are flagged all by Google et al. How do you run an API server that needs to make any outbound connections if Google, Facebook, Microsoft, etc. all consider the IP block tainted? I guess you just need to buy your IPs from Google, right?
That's exactly the same tactic Google used with GMail. The original spam filtering was super aggressive and shitty and the solution, according to Google, was to use GMail instead of other providers. "Get a big provider" is a very poor answer to a question that has a technical solution IMO.
> My mailserver is marked as spam by gmail
Have you tried GSuite (or whatever they're calling it these days)? /s
Google seems to behave like a hybrid Borg collective which spawns mini collectives, isolates them from the hive, allows them to go explore and mature somewhat, and then either absorbs them (assimilate!) or kills them if they don't fit back in.
While surely there are some humans at the top making strategic decisions, it feels to an end user that they are utterly soulless. The collective works to observe processes and outcomes (based on metrics which don't include human concerns or at least weight them very low), and then it makes changes and iterates. I wouldn't be surprised if there are already elements within the Google-beast which are unknowable to the humans working there. The concepts or goals and results may be knowable, but the path taken may not.
It should be obvious that the current "internet" (easy name for the state of online-anything these days) system is unsustainable. Perhaps it will go the way of the AI operating system in Her (2013 film), simply ignoring humans (whereby the humans will be able to use whatever of the services are accessible until they become inaccessible or non-functioning); or maybe it will determine that the best path which results in the best outcomes is to do absolutely nothing - thereby ending all operation. Naturally the humans with access to the source and the systems can attempt to correct the errant course once it is recognized, but short of a complete rewrite with a new approach, it will fail. They will go the way of all giant companies (and countries) who have sat at the top of the hill for too long and lost the values which led them to the top.
Facebook will hopefully go the way of reality TV (or is that still a thing?). How or why? Who knows. Perhaps another few rounds of global lockdowns will make everyone so desperate for actual human contact that they eschew social networks and take up dancing, casual sporting, dinner parties, and other great life activities. (Or more likely, their ads will get worse and worse until the stench is so bad that no respectable company would be caught with an ad on Facebook; the money would vanish, the talent would bail, and eventually they would get bought by a Comcast and rebranded as AhOLe or somesuch.)
Amazon will eventually ONLY sell cheap knockoff products up until the original creators stop creating, and the copycats are left to try to imagine and make their own unique products (the result of which will be a physical form on par with the nonsensical text they currently put on boxes and in instruction booklets).
Microsoft will still make and sell Office and Windows, forever and ever, because humans will never collectively choose to get educated on technology; it's easier to just keep using what you've always used. (Not to say that Windows or Office is bad, but it's often not the best choice.) Still, MS will outlive Google.
Apple will continue to exist and maybe hold a high place until eventually the designers, wild-thinkers (there must still be some there) get replaced with stock market drones with one monitor dedicated to the current quarter revenue projection spreadsheet. Then it will be a slow decline. MS will outlive them.
Almost forgot Twitter. The orange monster will fade into the history book which nobody wants to read, and the followers of orange monster will predictably be so poor as their local economies dry up (except for the private prison jobs, but there are only so many positions to fill) that they won't be able to afford the shoddy Comcast internet that is the officially sanctioned local monopoly internet. Besides, words will have been replaced with PopTop or whatever the latest 3 second video service is. They'll be too late to pivot to GIFs only since Imgur has been lying in wait for this moment.
Well, what a bit of fun this was. Might be that we're worrying about nothing, or perhaps worrying about entirely the wrong thing. Surprise, asteroid!
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Also his website is just affiliate link garbage. I looked through like 12 categories where I consider myself very familiar with the market for what's available and the product recommendations are poor. At best. Half of the recommendations look like your standard rebadged Alibaba crap peddled on Amazon with all the fake reviews that follow. I guess the name of the site is a tacit admission that probably the products a…
He's competing with a huge army of auto-generated spam sites that are in the same business. Best LED strip lights? Good luck getting on the front page of that one. The results are dominated by sites using superficially respectable, popular domains to push the same affiliate spam.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, if there were no Google-like companies, what would this site do?
Whatever he would do in a universe that does not exist is irrelevant. We live in this universe.
It's not like he'd have a thriving business if only Google didn't exist. Instead, he's reliant on Google choosing to rank his page highly enough to get traffic for search queries that will result in people clicking on his affiliate links (who he's also reliant on). Google doesn't owe him any particular ranking. If people search for his example "cheap portable generator", does Google have some ethical responsibility to put his site at the top? Or even on the first page? Or to never change where they rank it once it reaches the first page?