Live data from Hacker News

My Google Traffic Has Fallen to Zero

goodcheapandfast.com

81–90 of 409 posts

Re: My Google Traffic Has Fallen to Zero

#81

Seems like he has a couple of flag words "cheap and fast" in his URL that others have used in the past as indicators of spam domains, at least I've seen that for email. Even good isn't great to use. And looking at the page naming conventions that carries all the way through. A broad brush penalty to over generalized key words indicative of spam, and shopping site type directories would definitely account for this thi…

Also his website is just affiliate link garbage. I looked through like 12 categories where I consider myself very familiar with the market for what's available and the product recommendations are poor. At best. Half of the recommendations look like your standard rebadged Alibaba crap peddled on Amazon with all the fake reviews that follow. I guess the name of the site is a tacit admission that probably the products a…

He's competing with a huge army of auto-generated spam sites that are in the same business. Best LED strip lights? Good luck getting on the front page of that one. The results are dominated by sites using superficially respectable, popular domains to push the same affiliate spam.

Re: My Google Traffic Has Fallen to Zero

#82
This comment is way too verbose. First two paragraphs summarize my feelings and the rest is honestly for the site author's consideration as to the experience of a complete stranger to their site. I wish them the best.

I was actually moved by the author's plight. Their current situation seems very helpless and I truly respect the effort to swim upstream with a principled approach to delivering a service in a market that is rife with shenanigans. I personally tend to get sucked into analysis paralysis when purchasing new products and any quality signal I can get outside of what is placed in front of me is extremely valuable. Probably to amplify the author's point, I can't say I've ever heard of his site and it's not recognizable to me. One of my favorites for quite some time, Wirecutter, has lost all of my faith after a few buys based on their findings wound up being garbage.

I say all of that to try to underscore the fact that I'm only trying to be productive, but without this backstory and the author's attestation to everything they do to maintain integrity, I wouldn't find this site remarkable or memorable or compelling in any way. I appreciate the design, it's clean and fast, but in reviewing several of the product areas that I've actually been looking at recently I can't find anything compelling in the content that the site brings to the table. To be blunt, it's not obvious to me what the author does with their time if this is their bread and butter.

One example. A few months ago I decided I wanted to upgrade the microphone I use for videoconferencing. I wanted something that was fairly directional as I didn't want to have the microphone in the view of the camera and I was hoping for a relatively flat frequency response. I was also on the bubble about going with a USB microphone vs getting an XLR mic and USB audio interface, and comparing them by pivoting on that feature was useful to me.

Here is the list of Good Cheap and Fast streaming microphones (which seems relevant) on goodcheapandfast.com: https://www.goodcheapandfast.com/articles/best-streaming-mic...

Let's assume I get to that URL from a Google search result and this is my first an only impression. Right off the drop I notice a few things (i'm on a PC):

- Design is spartan and the site loads quickly. I can't actually tell that there are no ads b/c my ad blocking game is on point.

- There isn't an obvious brand, the site logo is understated and loses the battle with the headline for any attention.

- My eyes instead fall to the blue badge on the right 'Real Customer Reviews & Ratings [VERIFIED]'. This primes my expectation that I'm going to be seeing some verified reviews.

Maybe this is just me, but I don't start by reading the text. I start scanning down the page

.

.

. Omnidirectional I see this, see Cardioid is next and realize it's just a mini tutorial on pickup patterns, not going to read it.

.

.

. Dynamic v Condenser more tutorial stuff (let's be honest, in my head i'm thinking more copy/paste)

.

.

. How much does a good...cost. Not really interested in reading a paragraph on this...i have no idea what it says.

.

.

. Pyle USB PC Recording Condenser Microphone (PDMIUSB50) Pyle? Interesting pick for the top of the list. Solid value brand in amplifiers but not really known for anything in recording...but maybe they have a sleeper in this microphone, let's see those 'verified reviews'

.

.

. Fifine K669B USB Metal Condenser Recording Microphone

.

What? The next microphone already? This is where I stop scrolling. My eyes turn up and I see the entirety of the assessment of the Pyle microphone

    Good Value: $56 | Great Deal: $50
    
    Check Current Price on Amazon | Check Current Price on Walmart
    
    Pyle's plug-and-play USB microphone is durable, sensitive and clear, 
    according to several online customers. Some reviewers warn that the mute 
    button makes an audible pop; others wish the stand was more durable.
In my mind i hear 'what the hell?' Where are the verified reviews? Where is the detail? All I see is an unsupported price range of good and great deal, affiliate links and a throwaway blurb that indicates they read a few reviews.

OK, I click around a bit looking for a more detailed review of this product. Nothing. I grab the scroll bar and drag up and down the page, more of the same.

And then I leave. Sorry.

Again, I really empathize with the authors situation and respect their philosophy, but without some reason to really really drill into what is being presented the site is a non-starter.

Re: My Google Traffic Has Fallen to Zero

#84
post #73
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As someone who occasionally moves countries, this is horrifying. Did you enable 2FA and still need to authenticate via text? I used to enable 2FA, but got worried about phone loss/damage.

Do they even let you enable non-SMA 2FA anymore? Last I checked the TOTP option was gone.

On Google? Both totp and second device authentication are still supported.

Re: My Google Traffic Has Fallen to Zero

#85
post #16

Google is doing a terrible job at it’s core responsibility. I look forward to watching the company falter over the coming decade. Switching costs for a search engine are pretty damn low. And yet their search product is littered with crap and exploits users like only a monopolist would. Ideally they’ll continue burning goodwill by doing things like adding some fact-checking or censorship “features” into Gmail, delisti…

> Switching costs for a search engine are pretty damn low. Are they, though? I seem to recall conversations here where some larger sites were only allowing googlebot to crawl their site in robots.txt rules. Their thinking was that the vast majority of traffic is coming from google, and it wasn't worth it to have multiple also-ran search engines crawling their site frequently. There's a case to be made that search eng…

Web crawling is a natural monopoly, and perhaps should be treated as such. That's easily compartmentalized from search itself.

Re: My Google Traffic Has Fallen to Zero

#86
post #34

I’ve had similar experiences with other google products: My mom forgot her gmail password and no longer had the same mobile number for a reset, the secondary reset option was set to my email but would not send a reset despite this. We had a live session via thunderbird but there were no channels of support. Luckily we were able to register her old mobile number to achieve a password reset, thanks to a helpful phone p…

Anti-monopoly laws exist for a reason. Splitting Google (and other IT monopolies) is the only remedy their monopolistic behaviour.

This is worse than monopolistic behavior. Show me where old school AT&T acted like this.

Re: My Google Traffic Has Fallen to Zero

#87
post #50

It feels like there's two possible explanations here. One is that somehow the website has been incorrectly flagged or blacklisted, like the example he mentions with Bing. In that case, it seems like it'd be at least nice for Google to be able to look into it, but it also might be the sort of thing where Google just decides it's not worth the effort. The other possibility is that Google just updated their search algor…

The problem is that there are very few viable distribution channels that we are forced to rely on companies like Google.

What other viable choices does this site have aside from Google?

Re: My Google Traffic Has Fallen to Zero

#88

I’ve had similar experiences with other google products: My mom forgot her gmail password and no longer had the same mobile number for a reset, the secondary reset option was set to my email but would not send a reset despite this. We had a live session via thunderbird but there were no channels of support. Luckily we were able to register her old mobile number to achieve a password reset, thanks to a helpful phone p…

Wow. I'm you in both respects. I just had the same problem with my dad and even though he can send and receive email from his gmail account they still won't tell him the password. All he has is the fragile oauth token on mail.app on his apple smart phone that can only connect via wifi due to the loss of the old phone number. Additionally, my mail from my independent mailserver just started being marked as spam by goo…

You just have to wonder why this is.

And I have a theory. My theory is they did the risk benefit analysis of all this and decided this was the best way to go. I think the the hole that opens up when you are open to appeals and special cases is too great, the bad press from one bad case is so bad that it's ok to ignore all the folks who have lost their accounts. I mean, what other explanation, what other reason can there possibly be for this?

Re: My Google Traffic Has Fallen to Zero

#89

For me, Google only sends organic traffic to my posts that are 10-20 years old (no joke). My newer content, while verified by me as indexed by Google, receives zero traffic. For my old content, I have started to place warning banners for my users that they are reading old, and sometimes outdated content, that I only leave online for archival reasons. It makes me wonder if Google is doing this with my little blog, is…

Start embedding links in the text of your old content that point to your new content (when contextually appropriate, of course). Not as warnings, but if for some reason you mention a topic or word that's relevant to a newer article...

Thanks for the tip, will try that where appropriate content relationships exist, but suspect it's minor occurrences (when you blog for 20+ years, your output varies considerably in terms of topics over time!).

Google does not like my new topics it seems, starting around 2012, but thankfully unlike the OP who I have a lot of sympathy for, my blog is for fun and not livelihood.

We write for bots, so they can decide to share with our fellow humans (or not), such is our lot...

Post reply on HN