[flagged]
> Russia is trying to determine if the US is useing these particular satelites for real time targeting and weapons direction on Russians, in Russia, which if true,then makes it there absolute right to destroy the sattelite weapons systems, and legaly target there operators, wherever they might be. Would that actually be true? How does delayed vs realtime change if they are legitimate targets?
Is Russia Maneuvering to Threaten an Iceye Satellite?
11–19 of 19 posts
Re: Is Russia Maneuvering to Threaten an Iceye Satellite?
#12[flagged]
Re: Is Russia Maneuvering to Threaten an Iceye Satellite?
#13[flagged]
> Russia is trying to determine if the US is useing these particular satelites for real time targeting and weapons direction on Russians, in Russia, which if true,then makes it there absolute right to destroy the sattelite weapons systems, and legaly target there operators, wherever they might be. Would that actually be true? How does delayed vs realtime change if they are legitimate targets?
Re: Is Russia Maneuvering to Threaten an Iceye Satellite?
#14Re: Is Russia Maneuvering to Threaten an Iceye Satellite?
#15What are these units relating the rate of use of fuel: m/s? Is it the velocity of expelled reaction gas?
Re: Is Russia Maneuvering to Threaten an Iceye Satellite?
#16What are these units relating the rate of use of fuel: m/s? Is it the velocity of expelled reaction gas?
I think that's delta-v.
But to me,
“In this case, the fuel required to conduct such a maneuver is ~105-106m/sec”
means that they’re talking about a quantity of fuel, but giving a velocity.