Please don't take my comment in a bad way, but to me it feels wrong to take what's being offered for free and without limits by another company (here, issues from github), to then monetize it. It may look like a good idea to make $ from the other company pricing decisions, but it ignores the very previsible dynamic effects: I've heard about how other companies "unlimited" offers were turned into a different product b…
Untitled topic
11–16 of 16 posts
Re: undefined
#12Interesting, but seems a bit odd to charge a subscription for this. Legally dicey too. Outside the sheer absurdity of it, it’s not clear to me that this might not be a GitHub product. The owners may want to make this more clear.
Re: undefined
#13[deleted]
Re: undefined
#14https://gist.aviperl.me/
Re: undefined
#15Please don't take my comment in a bad way, but to me it feels wrong to take what's being offered for free and without limits by another company (here, issues from github), to then monetize it. It may look like a good idea to make $ from the other company pricing decisions, but it ignores the very previsible dynamic effects: I've heard about how other companies "unlimited" offers were turned into a different product b…
[flagged]
Re: undefined
#16Semi-related, but this reminded me of this interesting and cool idea of using the issue tracker on Github to manage non-software related tasks. In this example, he uses Github Issues to track his home maintenance [1]. [1] https://scribe.rip/https:/medium.com/@01010111/managing-your...