Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

SRI’s radioactive contamination treatment is now in its first-in-human trial

sri.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

11–20 of 25 posts

Re: SRI’s radioactive contamination treatment is now in its first-in-human trial

#11

Post by acidburnNSA »

munificent wrote: post #7

> the previously approved transuranic radionuclide decontamination drug, diethylenetriamine pentaacetate (DTPA), can only be administered intravenously or by nebulizer—both of which are less feasible options for rapidly treating large populations than the oral route of HOPO 14-1. Man, the hypothetical scenarios they used to get funding for this must have been horrific. Let's hope this drug is never needed.

It's pretty striking that when they set off the Castle Bravo thermonuclear weapons test in the Pacific Ocean, someone superimposed the fallout map on the continental USA. If it had been dropped on DC, half of the population in NYC would have received a fatal dose from the fallout (if unsheltered).

Kinda nuts.

> "If Bravo had been detonated in Washington, D.C., instead of Bikini, Fields illustrated with a diagram, that lifetime dose in the Washington-Baltimore area would have been 5,000 roentgens; in Philadelphia, more than 1,000 roentgens; in New York City, more than 500, or enough to result in death for half the population if fully exposed to all the radiation delivered. This diagram was classified secret and received very little distribution beyond the Commissioners"

https://whatisnuclear.com/img/castle-bravo-if-on-dc.png

Page 182 of Atoms for Peace and War [1]

[1] https://www.energy.gov/management/articles/hewlett-and-holl-...

If a thermonuclear blast happens anywhere in your region, GO INSIDE IMMEDIATELY AND STAY INSIDE WHEREVER YOU ARE FOR AT LEAST 2 DAYS!

Re: SRI’s radioactive contamination treatment is now in its first-in-human trial

#12

Post by nullc »

acidburnNSA wrote: post #11
munificent wrote: post #7

> the previously approved transuranic radionuclide decontamination drug, diethylenetriamine pentaacetate (DTPA), can only be administered intravenously or by nebulizer—both of which are less feasible options for rapidly treating large populations than the oral route of HOPO 14-1. Man, the hypothetical scenarios they used to get funding for this must have been horrific. Let's hope this drug is never needed.

It's pretty striking that when they set off the Castle Bravo thermonuclear weapons test in the Pacific Ocean, someone superimposed the fallout map on the continental USA. If it had been dropped on DC, half of the population in NYC would have received a fatal dose from the fallout (if unsheltered). Kinda nuts. > "If Bravo had been detonated in Washington, D.C., instead of Bikini, Fields illustrated with a diagram, tha…

I think though Castle Bravo was dirtier than expected due to unexpected fission yield from the casing, right?

Re: SRI’s radioactive contamination treatment is now in its first-in-human trial

#13

Post by wincy »

nullc wrote: post #12
acidburnNSA wrote: post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's pretty striking that when they set off the Castle Bravo thermonuclear weapons test in the Pacific Ocean, someone superimposed the fallout map on the continental USA. If it had been dropped on DC, half of the population in NYC would have received a fatal dose from the fallout (if unsheltered). Kinda nuts. > "If Bravo had been detonated in Washington, D.C., instead of Bikini, Fields illustrated with a diagram, tha…

I think though Castle Bravo was dirtier than expected due to unexpected fission yield from the casing, right?

We can definitely make the bombs as dirty as we want, right? Surely there are bombs with this capability.

Re: SRI’s radioactive contamination treatment is now in its first-in-human trial

#14

Post by HPsquared »

acidburnNSA wrote: post #11
munificent wrote: post #7

> the previously approved transuranic radionuclide decontamination drug, diethylenetriamine pentaacetate (DTPA), can only be administered intravenously or by nebulizer—both of which are less feasible options for rapidly treating large populations than the oral route of HOPO 14-1. Man, the hypothetical scenarios they used to get funding for this must have been horrific. Let's hope this drug is never needed.

It's pretty striking that when they set off the Castle Bravo thermonuclear weapons test in the Pacific Ocean, someone superimposed the fallout map on the continental USA. If it had been dropped on DC, half of the population in NYC would have received a fatal dose from the fallout (if unsheltered). Kinda nuts. > "If Bravo had been detonated in Washington, D.C., instead of Bikini, Fields illustrated with a diagram, tha…

Also take iodine

Re: SRI’s radioactive contamination treatment is now in its first-in-human trial

#15

Post by XorNot »

wincy wrote: post #13
nullc wrote: post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think though Castle Bravo was dirtier than expected due to unexpected fission yield from the casing, right?

We can definitely make the bombs as dirty as we want, right? Surely there are bombs with this capability.

Yes but why would you? Radioactivity means you can't reoccupy the land yourself.

If dispensing misery is the goal, we have more effective chemical and biological weapons which are less militarily useful for the same reasons as a high-fallout nuclear bomb would be.

Re: SRI’s radioactive contamination treatment is now in its first-in-human trial

#16

Post by bostonsre »

XorNot wrote: post #15
wincy wrote: post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We can definitely make the bombs as dirty as we want, right? Surely there are bombs with this capability.

Yes but why would you? Radioactivity means you can't reoccupy the land yourself. If dispensing misery is the goal, we have more effective chemical and biological weapons which are less militarily useful for the same reasons as a high-fallout nuclear bomb would be.

In a mutually assured destruction scenario, I don't think you could plausibly expect to invade the other country. The world as we know it would be over but some people would survive the exchange, maybe those in power could have a lot of spite and want to completely salt the earth with some cesium nukes to prevent the other country from recovering even after the nuclear winter subsides.

Re: SRI’s radioactive contamination treatment is now in its first-in-human trial

#19

Post by XorNot »

bostonsre wrote: post #16
XorNot wrote: post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes but why would you? Radioactivity means you can't reoccupy the land yourself. If dispensing misery is the goal, we have more effective chemical and biological weapons which are less militarily useful for the same reasons as a high-fallout nuclear bomb would be.

In a mutually assured destruction scenario, I don't think you could plausibly expect to invade the other country. The world as we know it would be over but some people would survive the exchange, maybe those in power could have a lot of spite and want to completely salt the earth with some cesium nukes to prevent the other country from recovering even after the nuclear winter subsides.

Why would they build the weapon in the first place though? MAD is a deterrence strategy: the weapon isn't meant to be used, but to work you must have sufficient weapons to ensure you get reliable kills on all your military targets.

If this is the plan, then building more weapons than that is a pointless waste of money because you're not planning to use them. If MAD isn't the plan, but rather hostage taking (ala North Korea) then a high fallout device is still useless because you have Assured Destruction if you launch it, but also not enough capability to ensure it arrives (the US can plausibly defend against a "rogue launch").

So again, when would you bother building it? At any given junction you either have enough weapons, or you need more warheads putting heat and overpressure on targets to ensure reliable kills and this deterrence.

Building a bunch of weapons which will cause at most tens of thousands of deaths months later, after you incinerate millions makes absolutely no economic sense and hence why at the height of the Cold War everyone looked at the concept and concluded it wasn't worth pursuing outside of a research analysis.

Re: SRI’s radioactive contamination treatment is now in its first-in-human trial

#20

Post by LinuxBender »

alacritas0 wrote: post #8
nynx wrote: post #3

This is cool. This is for removing nucleotides from the body, rather than repairing damage done by radiation exposure (which probably can’t be done with drugs).

This is factually incorrect. This HOPO 14-1 chelates f-block elements, many of which are radioactive, without depleting other metal ions from the body which are essential for metabolism and other functions. Also, there are a large number of agents which can mitigate the damage done by radiation exposure when administered prophylactically

Do you know of a list of these and can they be acquired without prescriptions?
Post reply on HN