So, IBM using this opportunity to cut down their own org tree a bit more and "replace it with AI" (or simply drop some people) is not unexpected. Because consulting related to doing exactly that is probably what they'll be selling a lot for the next few years. Basically, as world + dog is trying to figure out how to fit AI into their businesses, consulting related to that is going to be booming. And IBM is a consulting company. A lot of their previous efforts are actually powering the backoffice of course. So now that AI is going to replace all of that, that basically means there is going to be a lot of consulting happening as to how that would work. So that's a good business opportunity.
IBM to pause hiring in plan to replace 7,800 jobs with AI
11–20 of 223 posts
Re: IBM to pause hiring in plan to replace 7,800 jobs with AI
#12> More mundane tasks such as providing employment verification letters or moving employees between departments will likely be fully automated, Krishna said. ...and if some employees quit out of frustration about being managed by AI (being "moved between departments" at the whim of an AI sounds pretty spooky to me at least), even better!
Whereas with human managers who knows? Maybe they're good, maybe they're bad, it's a reset every time.
Re: IBM to pause hiring in plan to replace 7,800 jobs with AI
#13IBM as a company barely makes sense at all at this point. They are a very large and a former tech company that mostly coasts along on doing expensive consulting projects around me-too clones of things that other people have invented just so they can still pretend to be a tech company. So you can do things with AI, cloud, and databases with them. But they aren't really leaders in any of that for a long time. And havin…
Re: IBM to pause hiring in plan to replace 7,800 jobs with AI
#14similar to that google guy who left because Google's AI is about to become a sentient, nice little boost to the retirement fund.
Re: IBM to pause hiring in plan to replace 7,800 jobs with AI
#15IBM as a company barely makes sense at all at this point. They are a very large and a former tech company that mostly coasts along on doing expensive consulting projects around me-too clones of things that other people have invented just so they can still pretend to be a tech company. So you can do things with AI, cloud, and databases with them. But they aren't really leaders in any of that for a long time. And havin…
Re: IBM to pause hiring in plan to replace 7,800 jobs with AI
#16Re: IBM to pause hiring in plan to replace 7,800 jobs with AI
#17IBM as a company barely makes sense at all at this point. They are a very large and a former tech company that mostly coasts along on doing expensive consulting projects around me-too clones of things that other people have invented just so they can still pretend to be a tech company. So you can do things with AI, cloud, and databases with them. But they aren't really leaders in any of that for a long time. And havin…
The irony of that is they are probably going to use AI services of competitors to do that despite pioneering the marketing on it for years, thus closing the loop.
Re: IBM to pause hiring in plan to replace 7,800 jobs with AI
#18Playing into fears about AI replacing large segments of the labour force in the coming years invites calls for regulators to slow down their competition. While at the same time this announcement makes investors happy because IBM is signalling that they're looking to both cut costs and embrace AI.
Re: IBM to pause hiring in plan to replace 7,800 jobs with AI
#19Re: IBM to pause hiring in plan to replace 7,800 jobs with AI
#20My experience is that there are lots of BS consulting jobs where I would wonder “what do these 10 people do?” This included lots of offshoring companies, like IBM, that seemed more about filling out whatever the budget sheet given to them than actually making software or even any evidence of software (commits, issues, etc). I expect that there are firms out there right now using ChatGPT to produce the facade of work…