Live data from Hacker News

Study finds that buttons in cars are safer and quicker to use than touchscreens

futurism.com

11–20 of 386 posts

Re: Study finds that buttons in cars are safer and quicker to use than touchscreens

#11
post #7

The same could be said for mobile phones. Some things can be done quicker with physical buttons. That's why people thought phones with just a screen would never become popular: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eywi0h_Y5_U But with a screen you can do many more things.

Well phones typically have physical buttons for things you want to do quickly (volume rocker, power, camera shutter, home (sometimes) etc.) when you may not be expected to be looking at the phone. They seem to understand the split.

A driver has only a few things they need to do while driving (beyond paying attention to the road) Menu diving to turn up the AC is just a fundamentally terrible idea, but car makers don't seem to care?

I saw a recent Marques Brownlee review of his $130k Tesla S and Every. Single. Control. in the interior is a capacitive button. Absolutely insane to offer no tactile feedback

https://youtu.be/34VZzBWBDN0

Re: Study finds that buttons in cars are safer and quicker to use than touchscreens

#12
post #7

The same could be said for mobile phones. Some things can be done quicker with physical buttons. That's why people thought phones with just a screen would never become popular: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eywi0h_Y5_U But with a screen you can do many more things.

but should you be doing many more things while driving? (the answer is no)

also, reaction time == safety

Re: Study finds that buttons in cars are safer and quicker to use than touchscreens

#13
post #7

The same could be said for mobile phones. Some things can be done quicker with physical buttons. That's why people thought phones with just a screen would never become popular: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eywi0h_Y5_U But with a screen you can do many more things.

but should you be doing many more things while driving? (the answer is no)

Should you be doing many more things while having a phone call? Turns out the concept of a phone changed.

It seems the concept of cars also change:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5X9XyHHTTQI

I watched this in the morning today, and in the 38 minute ride, the guy was mostly doing other things. Recording a video etc. In the whole ride, I think he only did something related to "driving" for a few seconds.

Re: Study finds that buttons in cars are safer and quicker to use than touchscreens

#17
I would love to see some EU legislation about car dashboards. As an occasional driver of many different brands and types of vehicles, I continue to be amazed at the usability crimes being committed in the name of 'looking cool' (stated reason) as well as 'cost savings' (most likely the real reason).

Any function that needs to be invoked or setting that needs to be changed by a reasonable person while driving should have dedicated hardware in a predictable position. So, that's direction indicators, outside lights (incl. high beams and fog lights), windshield wipers, cruise control, window defrost/defog, interior temperature/fan, media volume (am I forgetting anything?).

There is nothing more utterly annoying and outright dangerous than having to navigate some crappy touchscreen when your windows start fogging up or you need to turn off the radio in order to talk to that nice cop that just pulled you over.

Offenders here do not only include the T-brand, but also the B-brand, which has seen it fit to replace most of the controls in some of its cars with a single multi-function stalk (iDrive, I think?) that isn't good for anything, except as a reason to return your car for a refund...

Re: Study finds that buttons in cars are safer and quicker to use than touchscreens

#18
The actual "study" (really, an unscientific test) is here:

https://www.vibilagare.se/english/physical-buttons-outperfor...

At home we have both traditional vehicles with lots of knobs, and vehicles (Tesla) with mainly touchscreen buttons and voice commands. My personal experience:

* It takes at least a few weeks to become familiar enough with the touchscreen buttons and voice commands that they become second-nature.

* Commonly used functions are accessed by pushing a physical button on the steering wheel or on one of the stalks, or by pressing a touchscreen button that is always where you expect it to be.

* Once your body memorizes a small subset of commonly used functions, you use them without even thinking about them.

* Less common functions are hard to find in all vehicles, and are often nested in obscure sub-menus.

I'm OK with going "all-in" on touchscreen buttons and voice commands, complemented by a small number of physical buttons for commonly used functions.

Re: Study finds that buttons in cars are safer and quicker to use than touchscreens

#19
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

but should you be doing many more things while driving? (the answer is no)

Should you be doing many more things while having a phone call? Turns out the concept of a phone changed. It seems the concept of cars also change: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5X9XyHHTTQI I watched this in the morning today, and in the 38 minute ride, the guy was mostly doing other things. Recording a video etc. In the whole ride, I think he only did something related to "driving" for a few seconds.

> Should you be doing many more things while having a phone call? Turns out the concept of a phone changed.

Being distracted during a phone call doesn't pose a risk of grievous injuries or death to yourself or others. Unless the nature of cars fundamentally changes, they should not under any circumstances be cool entertainment devices. Your focus should be on your mirrors and the road ahead. Full stop.

Post reply on HN