Live data from Hacker News

Steinhaus Longimeter

cstaecker.fairfield.edu

11–20 of 27 posts

Re: Steinhaus Longimeter

#11
post #9
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This tool is for measuring curves drawn on a piece of paper, not abstract curves.

Oh, that doesn't make it any easier: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_Long_Is_the_Coast_of_Brita...

Well, it doesn't in theory, but it does in practice. Natural phenomena are only fractal over a certain range of scales. Outside that range they follow normal rules.

Re: Steinhaus Longimeter

#15
post #9
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This tool is for measuring curves drawn on a piece of paper, not abstract curves.

Oh, that doesn't make it any easier: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_Long_Is_the_Coast_of_Brita...

That doesn't fit on a piece of paper, either.

Re: Steinhaus Longimeter

#16
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh, that doesn't make it any easier: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_Long_Is_the_Coast_of_Brita...

That doesn't fit on a piece of paper, either.

A cartographer might disagree.

Re: Steinhaus Longimeter

#20
He groans with disappointment in the video that the longimeter and the map measurer don't give the same result, but we don't find out which was right. When he measures the curve he drew, the longimeter gives 28.9 mm but the map measurer (a.k.a. opisometer, a hand-held instrument for measuring curves on paper) says 34.5 mm; that's a 16% difference, so pretty big.

To do a real test, you could print out a curve with a mathematically calculated length, say a sine curve, then measure with both methods (and other methods like placing a string on top) to find out what works best in practice.

Post reply on HN