Earlier quoted context omitted.
This tool is for measuring curves drawn on a piece of paper, not abstract curves.
Oh, that doesn't make it any easier: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_Long_Is_the_Coast_of_Brita...
Steinhaus Longimeter
11–20 of 27 posts
Well, it doesn't in theory, but it does in practice. Natural phenomena are only fractal over a certain range of scales. Outside that range they follow normal rules.
Re: Steinhaus Longimeter
#12How is this better than using a string? (Actual piece of string, not text).
Re: Steinhaus Longimeter
#13This is brilliant.
Re: Steinhaus Longimeter
#14This is a great youtube channel as well! I liked this review on a planar planimeter and how it ties in to Green's Theorem.
Re: Steinhaus Longimeter
#15Re: Steinhaus Longimeter
#16Re: Steinhaus Longimeter
#17Also interesting is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opisometer
Re: Steinhaus Longimeter
#18Also interesting is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opisometer
I got you: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifKrwF47uP8
Re: Steinhaus Longimeter
#19Re: Steinhaus Longimeter
#20He groans with disappointment in the video that the longimeter and the map measurer don't give the same result, but we don't find out which was right. When he measures the curve he drew, the longimeter gives 28.9 mm but the map measurer (a.k.a. opisometer, a hand-held instrument for measuring curves on paper) says 34.5 mm; that's a 16% difference, so pretty big.
To do a real test, you could print out a curve with a mathematically calculated length, say a sine curve, then measure with both methods (and other methods like placing a string on top) to find out what works best in practice.