How a Trillion-Dollar Market Remains Hidden in Plain Sight
1–10 of 39 posts
Re: How a Trillion-Dollar Market Remains Hidden in Plain Sight
#2Re: How a Trillion-Dollar Market Remains Hidden in Plain Sight
#3This reminds me of www.zidisha.org where you can make micro-loans to 3rd-world individuals.
Re: How a Trillion-Dollar Market Remains Hidden in Plain Sight
#4Re: How a Trillion-Dollar Market Remains Hidden in Plain Sight
#5So if most lending moved to market lenders we would see a collapse in the money supply.
Re: How a Trillion-Dollar Market Remains Hidden in Plain Sight
#6Re: How a Trillion-Dollar Market Remains Hidden in Plain Sight
#7Market lenders aren't banks. They cannot use fractional reserve banking. If they take in $100 they loan out $100. A bank takes in $100 having loaned out $10K to satisfy reserve requirements 10% (likely less but keeping it simple). So if most lending moved to market lenders we would see a collapse in the money supply.
I wonder if the huge number of people/organisations that can loan money but not set up a fractional reserve system (eg because of regulations) amounts to a smaller amount of money available. People making smaller loans may be less risk-averse too?
Re: How a Trillion-Dollar Market Remains Hidden in Plain Sight
#8Market lenders aren't banks. They cannot use fractional reserve banking. If they take in $100 they loan out $100. A bank takes in $100 having loaned out $10K to satisfy reserve requirements 10% (likely less but keeping it simple). So if most lending moved to market lenders we would see a collapse in the money supply.
Re: How a Trillion-Dollar Market Remains Hidden in Plain Sight
#9This reminds me of www.zidisha.org where you can make micro-loans to 3rd-world individuals.
Re: How a Trillion-Dollar Market Remains Hidden in Plain Sight
#10Market lenders aren't banks. They cannot use fractional reserve banking. If they take in $100 they loan out $100. A bank takes in $100 having loaned out $10K to satisfy reserve requirements 10% (likely less but keeping it simple). So if most lending moved to market lenders we would see a collapse in the money supply.
If the bank's reserve requirement is 10%, wouldn't it only be able to lend out $90 of the $100 it had taken in deposits?
(Money multiplier is the inverse of the reserve requirement)