Live data from Hacker News

How a Trillion-Dollar Market Remains Hidden in Plain Sight

techcrunch.com

1–10 of 39 posts

Re: How a Trillion-Dollar Market Remains Hidden in Plain Sight

#5
Market lenders aren't banks. They cannot use fractional reserve banking. If they take in $100 they loan out $100. A bank takes in $100 having loaned out $10K to satisfy reserve requirements 10% (likely less but keeping it simple).

So if most lending moved to market lenders we would see a collapse in the money supply.

Re: How a Trillion-Dollar Market Remains Hidden in Plain Sight

#7
post #5

Market lenders aren't banks. They cannot use fractional reserve banking. If they take in $100 they loan out $100. A bank takes in $100 having loaned out $10K to satisfy reserve requirements 10% (likely less but keeping it simple). So if most lending moved to market lenders we would see a collapse in the money supply.

Don't we already have a collapse in the money supply?

I wonder if the huge number of people/organisations that can loan money but not set up a fractional reserve system (eg because of regulations) amounts to a smaller amount of money available. People making smaller loans may be less risk-averse too?

Re: How a Trillion-Dollar Market Remains Hidden in Plain Sight

#8
post #5

Market lenders aren't banks. They cannot use fractional reserve banking. If they take in $100 they loan out $100. A bank takes in $100 having loaned out $10K to satisfy reserve requirements 10% (likely less but keeping it simple). So if most lending moved to market lenders we would see a collapse in the money supply.

If the bank's reserve requirement is 10%, wouldn't it only be able to lend out $90 of the $100 it had taken in deposits?

Re: How a Trillion-Dollar Market Remains Hidden in Plain Sight

#10
post #5

Market lenders aren't banks. They cannot use fractional reserve banking. If they take in $100 they loan out $100. A bank takes in $100 having loaned out $10K to satisfy reserve requirements 10% (likely less but keeping it simple). So if most lending moved to market lenders we would see a collapse in the money supply.

If the bank's reserve requirement is 10%, wouldn't it only be able to lend out $90 of the $100 it had taken in deposits?

Yes. But typically banks can leverage - for example, the bank which employs me typically lends out around $125-$135 for every $100 dollars in deposits. I guess the OP was trying to explain the money multiplier but got the example wrong.

(Money multiplier is the inverse of the reserve requirement)

Post reply on HN