Windows 9x Subsystem for Linux
social.hails.org
Windows 9x Subsystem for Linux
1–10 of 265 posts
Re: Windows 9x Subsystem for Linux
#2Yes, I have weird problems. I get to look after some very weird shit.
Re: Windows 9x Subsystem for Linux
#3Re: Windows 9x Subsystem for Linux
#4Re: Windows 9x Subsystem for Linux
#5Re: Windows 9x Subsystem for Linux
#6I guess easier than https://github.com/haileys/doslinux
Re: Windows 9x Subsystem for Linux
#7Okay what is it with WSL naming, this always confuses me. Shouldn't it be Linux subsystem for Windows?
It can work either way though.
Re: Windows 9x Subsystem for Linux
#8If I can get this to work (haven't tried yet) it directly solves a problem I have right now this week right here in 2026, 30 years after Windows 95 was even a thing. Yes, I have weird problems. I get to look after some very weird shit.
Still got those in this part of the world sharing space with state of the art autonomous 100+ tonne robo trucks.
Re: Windows 9x Subsystem for Linux
#9 I am going to run this in Windows 95 on a Sun PC card under Solaris 7.
from the same commenter who effused jesus fucking christ this is an abomination of epic proportions that has no right to exist in a just universe and I love it so muchRe: Windows 9x Subsystem for Linux
#10https://github.com/wishstudio/flinux
flinux essentially had the architecture of WSL1, while CoLinux was more like WSL2 with a Linux kernel side-loaded.
Cygwin was technically the correct approach: native POSIX binaries on Windows rather than hacking in some foreign Linux plumbing. Since it was merely a lightweight DLL to link to (or a bunch of them), it also kept the cruft low without messing with ring 0.
However, it lacked the convenience of a CLI package manager back then, and I remember being hooked on CoLinux when I had to work on Windows.