Live data from Hacker News

Windows 9x Subsystem for Linux

social.hails.org

1–10 of 265 posts

Re: Windows 9x Subsystem for Linux

#8

If I can get this to work (haven't tried yet) it directly solves a problem I have right now this week right here in 2026, 30 years after Windows 95 was even a thing. Yes, I have weird problems. I get to look after some very weird shit.

Old still running 24/7 industrial processing circuit with oddball bespoke addons based on DOS / early windows ??

Still got those in this part of the world sharing space with state of the art autonomous 100+ tonne robo trucks.

Re: Windows 9x Subsystem for Linux

#9

  I am going to run this in Windows 95 on a Sun PC card under Solaris 7.
from the same commenter who effused

  jesus fucking christ this is an abomination of epic proportions that has no right to exist in a just universe and I love it so much

Re: Windows 9x Subsystem for Linux

#10
Before WSL, the best ways to run unmodified Linux binaries inside Windows were CoLinux and flinux.

http://www.colinux.org/

https://github.com/wishstudio/flinux

flinux essentially had the architecture of WSL1, while CoLinux was more like WSL2 with a Linux kernel side-loaded.

Cygwin was technically the correct approach: native POSIX binaries on Windows rather than hacking in some foreign Linux plumbing. Since it was merely a lightweight DLL to link to (or a bunch of them), it also kept the cruft low without messing with ring 0.

However, it lacked the convenience of a CLI package manager back then, and I remember being hooked on CoLinux when I had to work on Windows.

Post reply on HN