France fines Apple €150M for “excessive” pop-ups that let users reject tracking
1–10 of 217 posts
Re: France fines Apple €150M for “excessive” pop-ups that let users reject tracking
#2So the fine seems to be for treating 3rd parties differently from their own stuff.
They could make their own popups require double confirmation instead...
Re: France fines Apple €150M for “excessive” pop-ups that let users reject tracking
#3Re: France fines Apple €150M for “excessive” pop-ups that let users reject tracking
#4Re: France fines Apple €150M for “excessive” pop-ups that let users reject tracking
#5It is good to straighten the other guys, hopefully they do not forget about themselves.
Re: France fines Apple €150M for “excessive” pop-ups that let users reject tracking
#6Actually Apple were fined because they don't apply the same standard to their own pop-ups that allow users to reject tracking. On Apple popups you seem to need one click, while on 3rd party popups you need to confirm twice. So the fine seems to be for treating 3rd parties differently from their own stuff. They could make their own popups require double confirmation instead...
Re: France fines Apple €150M for “excessive” pop-ups that let users reject tracking
#7At which point do we admit that this is simply extortion?
Re: France fines Apple €150M for “excessive” pop-ups that let users reject tracking
#8>The agency said there is an "asymmetry" in which user consent for Apple's own data collection is obtained with a single pop-up, but other publishers are "required to obtain double consent from users for tracking on third-party sites and applications." The press release notes that "while advertising tracking only needs to be refused once, the user must always confirm their consent a second time."
They take issue with Apple making it easier for their apps but applying a different standard for third parties. I think this fine is fair.
Re: France fines Apple €150M for “excessive” pop-ups that let users reject tracking
#9"We will not tell you how to fix what we found to be 'wrong', reserve the right to find your fixes 'wrong' again, and will charge you more" At which point do we admit that this is simply extortion?