Live data from Hacker News

CouchSurfing Deletes Itself, Shuts Down - Old, yet relevant

techcrunch.com

1–10 of 26 posts

Re: CouchSurfing Deletes Itself, Shuts Down - Old, yet relevant

#6
Besides the tragic (or incompetent?) tech failures, what do folks here think about the founder initially just calling it quits on the community?

Having followed this particular crash-recovery saga unfold and being involved with web 2.0 otherwise, it would be interesting to hear a few thoughts over this: what's the responsibility of the platform provider towards their possibly very engaged community - or is there any?

Re: CouchSurfing Deletes Itself, Shuts Down - Old, yet relevant

#8
post #6

Besides the tragic (or incompetent?) tech failures, what do folks here think about the founder initially just calling it quits on the community? Having followed this particular crash-recovery saga unfold and being involved with web 2.0 otherwise, it would be interesting to hear a few thoughts over this: what's the responsibility of the platform provider towards their possibly very engaged community - or is there any?

I think it's a difficult dilemma, but ultimately the founders don't owe the community unless people were paying for a service. Firstly, without the founder there would be no community, secondly, their work created and made the community possible. They have to be responsible to themselves, and that might mean taking a break.

If the community wants to remain a community then normally someone else will step up, that's the power of community, it's bigger than just a web site. In the case of couch surfing v2 seems to be going strong.

Re: CouchSurfing Deletes Itself, Shuts Down - Old, yet relevant

#10
post #8
post #6

Besides the tragic (or incompetent?) tech failures, what do folks here think about the founder initially just calling it quits on the community? Having followed this particular crash-recovery saga unfold and being involved with web 2.0 otherwise, it would be interesting to hear a few thoughts over this: what's the responsibility of the platform provider towards their possibly very engaged community - or is there any?

I think it's a difficult dilemma, but ultimately the founders don't owe the community unless people were paying for a service. Firstly, without the founder there would be no community, secondly, their work created and made the community possible. They have to be responsible to themselves, and that might mean taking a break. If the community wants to remain a community then normally someone else will step up, that's t…

I would hope the founder of a company with a successful community would at least try to pass on the name and membership to community members or other entrepreneurs who would try to continue the community. I'm sure there are plenty of entrepreneurs and businesses who would have been happy to get nothing but the domain name and member list to try to start a new couchsurfing (though it appears that the service came back just fine on its own).
Post reply on HN