CouchSurfing Deletes Itself, Shuts Down - Old, yet relevant
1–10 of 26 posts
Re: CouchSurfing Deletes Itself, Shuts Down - Old, yet relevant
#2Re: CouchSurfing Deletes Itself, Shuts Down - Old, yet relevant
#3Re: CouchSurfing Deletes Itself, Shuts Down - Old, yet relevant
#4Re: CouchSurfing Deletes Itself, Shuts Down - Old, yet relevant
#5Re: CouchSurfing Deletes Itself, Shuts Down - Old, yet relevant
#6Having followed this particular crash-recovery saga unfold and being involved with web 2.0 otherwise, it would be interesting to hear a few thoughts over this: what's the responsibility of the platform provider towards their possibly very engaged community - or is there any?
Re: CouchSurfing Deletes Itself, Shuts Down - Old, yet relevant
#7Re: CouchSurfing Deletes Itself, Shuts Down - Old, yet relevant
#8Besides the tragic (or incompetent?) tech failures, what do folks here think about the founder initially just calling it quits on the community? Having followed this particular crash-recovery saga unfold and being involved with web 2.0 otherwise, it would be interesting to hear a few thoughts over this: what's the responsibility of the platform provider towards their possibly very engaged community - or is there any?
If the community wants to remain a community then normally someone else will step up, that's the power of community, it's bigger than just a web site. In the case of couch surfing v2 seems to be going strong.
Re: CouchSurfing Deletes Itself, Shuts Down - Old, yet relevant
#9At some point you have to be able to trust people, and unless you are already an expert in that area how do you really know?
Re: CouchSurfing Deletes Itself, Shuts Down - Old, yet relevant
#10Besides the tragic (or incompetent?) tech failures, what do folks here think about the founder initially just calling it quits on the community? Having followed this particular crash-recovery saga unfold and being involved with web 2.0 otherwise, it would be interesting to hear a few thoughts over this: what's the responsibility of the platform provider towards their possibly very engaged community - or is there any?
I think it's a difficult dilemma, but ultimately the founders don't owe the community unless people were paying for a service. Firstly, without the founder there would be no community, secondly, their work created and made the community possible. They have to be responsible to themselves, and that might mean taking a break. If the community wants to remain a community then normally someone else will step up, that's t…