Live data from Hacker News

The World Needs a Secular Community Revolution

evolution-institute.org

111–120 of 183 posts

Re: The World Needs a Secular Community Revolution

#111
post #25

The US used to have that. You can still see the remnants if you look. Rotary International, Kiwanis International, the Independent Order of Foresters, the Veterans of Foreign Wars, the Independent Order of Odd Fellows, the National Grange of the Order of Patrons of Husbandry - all those secular fraternal organizations still exist. The core of these organizations was small business owners, a group which once ran their…

The Independent Order of Odd Fellows is not a secular organization:

http://www.ioof.org/ - "Do you believe in a supreme being, the creator and preserver of the universe?"

http://www.ioof.org/IOOF/FAQ.aspx - "Founded on the inspired word of God as revealed to man in the Holy Bible."

Re: The World Needs a Secular Community Revolution

#112
post #25

The US used to have that. You can still see the remnants if you look. Rotary International, Kiwanis International, the Independent Order of Foresters, the Veterans of Foreign Wars, the Independent Order of Odd Fellows, the National Grange of the Order of Patrons of Husbandry - all those secular fraternal organizations still exist. The core of these organizations was small business owners, a group which once ran their…

While somewhat on the side of the organizations listed, AFS Intercultural Programs[1] (formerly American Field Service -- volunteer ambulance personnel for WWI and WWII) does share some of the ideas as one might want from such an organization -- while focusing on (student) intercultural exchange as a the main method with which to increase what could be called positive globalization.

[1] http://www.afs.org/

Re: The World Needs a Secular Community Revolution

#113

I liked the article, but this is like the cultural equivalent of Not Invented Here. Does it really matter that organized Christianity believes that a guy woke up from the dead? If you want a sense of community and the rituals that go along with it, then you could absolutely join a church of your choosing and just not believe in zombie messiahs. The wife and I have been talking about this at great length as of late. W…

I think it is a very valid option.

At my previous neighborhood mainstream church (Methodist) which I attended for a while, many attendees did not really believe in most of what was preached. For them it was mostly a social gathering, an opportunity to sing enthusiastically together (and how often do you get to do that today?), and a lot of social events (church picnics etc). As a social group it worked very well. People really would help each other out. The subject of religion rarely came up in any of these social events, and you could certainly get by without having any real belief or even much knowledge of traditional Christianity.

I've been trying to think why it worked while secular communities do not, since it was in a sense a secular community. All I can think of is that most members had been there all their lives, it was what they grew into, and it was welcoming to outsiders.

If you can handle the cognitive dissonance of listening to sermons every week that you do not really believe, I think it can be a plausible way of getting that kind of social engagement.

Re: The World Needs a Secular Community Revolution

#114
post #99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you join a fundamentalist cult, then yes. Lots of modern churches are non-denominational and quite relaxed. In fact, they are surprisingly similar to the entity being described in the article.

I'm pretty sure a belief in the major parts of the bible are necessary, are they not? I mean, I thought the resurrection of christ was the whole point of anything describable as Christianity? Without that, well is that 'church' ?

The whole point of Christ dying was to forgive sins.

In the old testament they would sacrifice animals and use the blood of the animals to wash away sin. People would sacrifice animals at the temple with a Priest and collect the blood to wash away their sins.

Christ was God's sacrifice to end that practice Christ's blood was shed to wash away our sins. Christ was dead for three days to build a bypass from hell into heaven. Before that it wasn't possible to reach heaven. Christ rose from the dead and promises on judgement day when he returned to raise the dead and judge them.

Islam differs on Jesus they see him as a Prophet didn't die on the cross, and converted to Islam, and there is no trinity in their religion. Jesus is not the son of God or Messiah but a Prophet instead named Isa.

Some churches are converting to Chrislam where they rewrite the Bible to be compatible with Islam. One that Christ doesn't die and isn't resurrected.

You'll find that there are many different versions of Christianity, even Atheist Christians who follow Christ's teachings but don't believe he is a God.

Many Christians became non-practicing because they got busy with their jobs or they just stopped believing. A lot of atheists used to be Christian at one point, and just didn't believe in God any more.

In modern times people worship science and technology and don't see a need for God anymore.

When you visit a church you see elderly people, and the sick and disabled, the sort of people who need God. You don't see very many of the young adults who are healthy, if there are any young people they come in with their parents.

Re: The World Needs a Secular Community Revolution

#115

I find it weird that a website called "evolution-institute" is calling for more community, and even pointing to religious communities as an example. If evolution created us social, then evolution will provide our salvation. Or we'll die off because we're less fit. On the other hand, if the religious communities seem to be more fit enough that they are worth emulating, maybe that says something about evolution. Discla…

Evolution is just a mechanical process that arises when you put self-replicating organisms in a noisy environment for a long time. The process doesn't care about society and its current beliefs, because human brains are several orders of magnitude faster than human reproduction.

Re: The World Needs a Secular Community Revolution

#116

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I just ran into a Independent Order of Odd Fellow lodge a couple weeks ago, while visiting a new city (Decorah, IA). I thought: what the hell is that? A little googling revealed the underlying ethos of the organization to be highly attractive, but from what I can glean from the website the whole thing seems to have fallen into decay. Pity. The 'pushback against big business' angle was news to me, though. Interesting…

From what I recall a lot of these where set up for those who felt the Masons where it bit to secretive or a bit to Deist for some peoples tastes

Masons are the quintessential white boy money club. They have absolutely nothing to do with actual stone cutting, they have have an infatuation with having a long lived legacy, like the Pyramids.

Re: The World Needs a Secular Community Revolution

#117
The problem is that the world is full of diverse people who all have different opinions and beliefs on how things should work.

I visited Thailand three times, it is around a Buddhism community. Quite different from the Christian communities you'd see in the USA. Christians are a small minority in Thailand and there are more Muslim and Chinese than Christian. Each one has their own community. I visited a Muslim community because one of my wife's cousins had married a Muslim man. They were very nice to me and my family. Five times a day a car would loud speakers would drive around for their daily prayer. There was no pork or alcohol for sale before their religion forbids it. They cut their chicken differently from us, but it tastes good.

I am not sure if they'd go for a secular community. They already got one of their own religious communities and have done this sort of thing for most of their lives.

Moving away from religion and becoming secular is a western thing not an eastern thing.

I see the Dawkins Foundation was mentioned, a lot of times they criticize and attack religions when they could have used the resources to help out people in the community instead. Using hate instead of love, and then sometimes having to retract web pages when proven wrong like the Jesus is Horus thing or the Easter is Ishtar thing.

You have secular communities in the USA and UK, but they are small and limited.

Public schools in the USA got rid of religion, but didn't find anything to replace it to teach morals and ethics instead like critical thinking.

The problem is when you get rid of religion you get rid of a lot of good stuff too, and if you claim religion is bad and you get rid of it, it is like tossing the baby out with the bathwater. A lot of Christian charities did adoptions, and got attacked because they didn't support same sex marriage, so they went out of business and left a big hole to be filled. The same with Christian homeless shelters, many had to close down due to being attacked and criticized. There were no secular homeless shelters to replace them.

As the community moves away from religion and towards secularism, they have to replace the structure that was there by religious communities. It takes a lot of money to do that and a lot of volunteers.

Re: The World Needs a Secular Community Revolution

#118
post #4

I wonder if an "organized secularism" would only copy some the problems found in organized religion. Do people become less religious only because of a rejection of the supernatural, or for other reasons as well? I think some people become less religious for two additional reasons as well: "shared values" and "rituals." A set of shared values is nice until it fails to change in response to changes in the values of ind…

On rituals: One user over at Less Wrong wrote a couple of posts[1][2] on designing ritual, and associated value and dangers. I also found the 2012 edition of a ritual book[3] that his group used to formally mark the winter solstice.

[1]: http://lesswrong.com/lw/93l/the_value_and_danger_of_ritual/ [2]: http://lesswrong.com/lw/9aw/designing_ritual/ [3]: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2000477/SolsticeEve_2012...

Re: The World Needs a Secular Community Revolution

#119
post #104
post #87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Salvation

[deleted]

EDIT: To provide context since the parent comment was deleted, they were asking for a logical breakdown of why Jesus would require worship in order to provide salvation.

To break it down: God is completely pure (without sin). To be with God (which is what we would call 'salvation') we would also need to be without sin. Obviously, no human is without sin - meaning we could never be with God. Prior to Jesus, we were required to sacrifice things in order to atone for our sins and get right with God. Jesus provided an eternal, perfect sacrifice to pay for everyone's sins. It isn't so much that we need to worship Him, more that we need to accept the sacrifice He has already provided - if we reject the sacrifice, the full penance for all our actions is on us, and we can never be with God.

Re: The World Needs a Secular Community Revolution

#120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Out of curiosity, why secular humanism vs existential nihilism? I don't think I'll switch sides and time soon, but if I did it would be to nihilism.

I may not be reading you correctly, but I understand you to be coming from a position of faith and happy therein (for now). If so, your standpoint makes sense to me. I imagine you may feel it would take a good deal of momentum to cross the boundary at the edge of your faith. A nihilist alternative may also act as a warning of the scary outside to those still on the inside. Nevertheless, it is not actually necessary t…

I am happy with my faith. I've gone through a crisis of it. I've come out much stronger on the other side.

Specifically to the extreme, during that time I re-evaluated possible philosophic systems. I am an absolutist. I think there is Truth. Without a god, I needed to see if there was any system that provided a similar world view. Existential nihilism does. It says that the only fact we have is that nothing fundamentally matters (I'm treating existential nihilism apart from the extreme skeptics that deny the existence of things). The universe will die, or collapse and re-expand. Regardless to the exact details, every invention and power of man amounts to nothing. Therefore since every man is within the group man, individual acts amount to nothing. I've not seen a more honest system than this. I want an honest system

Most other systems are predicated on a quasi-Christian-like system. They believe that people are somehow different than everything else in the universe. That they have intrinsic meaning while nothing else does. Or they go to the other extreme that makes everything equally special, and as we're taught in the movie The Incredibles, nothing is special then. As we've seen in this thread, the view might boil down to "it makes me feel good to help people".

The problem that I have with such systems is that they ultimately anchor to a feeling or some other arbitrary truth. Upon that rock an edifice is made from which various dogmas are shouted. If I were to throw away one system of belief with that behavior, why would I adopt another?

As a result, I find that there are only two systems that could be true given what humanity knows: some form of theism or nihilism. I'm convinced of the former, specifically Jesus as the Christ, but I find no honest system possible other than nihilism if my feeling and beliefs were some how shown to be false.

Post reply on HN