Kim Dotcom Answers Questions

Post by lcswi » Fri, Jul 31, 2015, 7:10 AM UTC

Post by GordonS » Fri, Jul 31, 2015, 7:13 AM UTC

lcswi wrote: post #12

vmay wrote: post #2

Can anyone recommend an alternative?

5$ for a 500 gigabyte server, put seafile on it, done.

Post by pgeorgi » Fri, Jul 31, 2015, 7:18 AM UTC

bitJericho wrote: post #5

leke wrote: post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think I'm going to wait for his opensource, non-profit alternative.

Would it be a violation of a non-compete to drum up interest before the non-compete expires?

Post by mappu » Fri, Jul 31, 2015, 7:21 AM UTC

GordonS wrote: post #13

lcswi wrote: post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

5$ for a 500 gigabyte server, put seafile on it, done.

Where can you get a 500GB server for $5?

Post by qopp » Fri, Jul 31, 2015, 7:26 AM UTC

DHowett wrote: post #18

typis7 wrote: post #6

I'm not involved in Mega anymore. Neither in a managing nor in a shareholder capacity. The company has suffered from a hostile takeover by a Chinese investor who is wanted in China for fraud. He used a number of straw-men and businesses to accumulate more and more Mega shares. Recently his shares have been seized by the NZ government. Which means the NZ government is in control. In addition Hollywood has seized all t…

If Dotcom wanted an open-source community-supported file sharing platform that couldn't be taken over by external forces, why did he create the perfect antithesis to that? Why did he in fact sign an agreement barring him from competing in that sector? I can't understand how somebody who wants such a perfect world consistently painted himself into a corner from which he couldn't.