Live data from Hacker News

How Academia Resembles a Drug Gang (2013)

blogs.lse.ac.uk

71–80 of 114 posts

Re: How Academia Resembles a Drug Gang (2013)

#71
How Academia does not resemble a drug gang:

1)Drug gangs don't have an excess of lazy administrative support staff.

2)Drug gangs actually have to deliver some drugs at some point.

3)The politics of drug gangs are less vicious and there is better teamwork.

Re: How Academia Resembles a Drug Gang (2013)

#72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> That describes every job... ever Wait, what? Most jobs give you a salary, sure, but you nearly always end up producing far more value than you are paid back. The thieves are the shareholders of the company you serve. (As for the land… not every piece of land is someone's property —and that's good.)

If you are producing more value than you are being paid for, why are you working there?

Most employees produce a little more to their company's bottom line, on average, than their salary+overhead. They allow the surplus to go to the employer in exchange for certain benefits -- such as security, consistency, and division of labor. A lot of people would rather make $50,000 with a 4% raise every year than make $60,000 on average but with occasional dry spells, the constantly-looming threat of not being able to find new clients, and the annoyance of having to manage your own research/dev/sales/marketing/insurance/taxes/licensing/misc paperwork.

Re: How Academia Resembles a Drug Gang (2013)

#73
To be fair, a similar pattern might be present in other industries as well, e.g. finance, food services, manufacturing, etc. I think the point the author is trying to make though is that academia is uniquely like a drug gang, but I'd don't see anything to justify that. My guess is that you'd find something like this in every large and hierarchically-organized system. That's not to say this is a good way to do things though...

Re: How Academia Resembles a Drug Gang (2013)

#74
post #6

If someone comes up with a better system, it will be adopted. It is very hard to determine who has the capacity to be a Professor. The current system works fine most of the time. It is true that crackpots get through on occasion, but the vast majority of professorial appointments are reasonable.

"If someone comes up with a better system, it will be adopted." Academia moves very, very slowly. Stuff remains unchanged for centuries , just because that's the way it's always been done. For instance, the lecture model was adopted when books were hand-written and very expensive -- basically the lecturer (in some institutions, actually called "reader") would read the text very slowly and distinctly, while the studen…

i LIKE my funny hat, thank you very much.

Re: How Academia Resembles a Drug Gang (2013)

#75

So now every organisational structure that has more people at the bottom than at the top resembles a drug gang? I blame Levitt.

Just to let others in on the reference, Levitt is the co-author of Freakonomics, a book that popularized, among other concepts, research showing that the average drug dealer gets terrible payment for the risk they take, and only stays in the business due to unrealistic hope of one day becoming one of the few drug lords that make insane amounts of cash.

Re: How Academia Resembles a Drug Gang (2013)

#76
post #57

As some one who managed to succeed in the academic rat race (tenured professor) and who quit to do more productive things, my feeling is academia is more like cult. When inside it you believe you are doing important things, and on occasion you actual do (i.e. teaching and research), but the important activities are basically a hobby you fit around your full-time job of administration and politics. Once outside you re…

What do you get when you combine the economic mechanism of a drug gang with the mind control technology of a cult, used to keep people in the system? A multi-level marketing scheme.

I think a multi-level marketing scheme includes a benefit for recruiting new people, in the form of some sort of "downline" compensation. As far as academia goes, this doesn't really exist, otherwise there'd be teaching/research assistant assistants, and so on

Re: How Academia Resembles a Drug Gang (2013)

#77

Interesting - some important points overlooked: - They assume that for everyone doing a PhD there is an equivalently attractive job waiting for them. However, many young people going doing PhDs (especially in the countries highlighted, Portugal, Greece, Slovakia) aren't choosing between a steady job and the uncertainty of PhD - there are often either no jobs available or very unattractive ones (e.g. working well belo…

You claim only a minority of people getting PhDs want to become a professor?

Citation?

Re: How Academia Resembles a Drug Gang (2013)

#78
Multi-level marketing schemes are similar, in that they exploit people leveraging those people's desire to improve their situation (or dream to get paid while doing nothing).

The film industry is similar, you work for low wages, hoping you will make it to the big time.

So is athletics, work for free at college, hope you make it to the NFL or wherever.

This pattern may be more common than most realize.

Re: How Academia Resembles a Drug Gang (2013)

#79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Having tenure affords opportunity. Can't get the golden parachute unless you play the game long enough (i.e., waste prime years).

I certainly missed the golden parachute. Even if I hung around until I was deadwood I would not have made anything financially. No academic in Australia gets rich just out of being an academic. I don’t regret my time as an academic other than my last two years. I should have left earlier, but the security the job afforded my family kept me there longer than I really should have stayed. This is a mistake many people m…

> No academic in Australia gets rich just out of being an academic.

Nobody ever expected to, in any country. Did they?

Post reply on HN