Live data from Hacker News

Humans are underrated

fortune.com

1–10 of 50 posts

Re: Humans are underrated

#2
An optimistic view on the future ;-)

'As technology becomes more dominant in the workplace, here are the three job skills that you need to thrive.'

'Adapted from Humans Are Underrated by Geoff Colvin, to be published on Aug. 4, 2015'

Re: Humans are underrated

#4
post #3

Can't operate in vacuum. Can't operate underwater for more than 3 minutes. Can only operate in a very narrow temperature range. Needs to shut down 8 hours a day.

Can heal, can feed in many areas, can adapt and fork. Not designed for productivity.

Re: Humans are underrated

#6
I guess this article answers what will the people who can't maintain or service robots do when everything is automated :-)

So, we'll get three classes of workers - robots doing the hard work, humans who manage the robots and those who manage human relationships. That's still a lot of people getting f'ed, because not everyone can be a manager.

Re: Humans are underrated

#7
The article touches on the major areas:

- Jobs where we need someone to be responsible. You may have fancy diagnostic computers and automated scalpels, but you are going to want a doctor somewhere. A NLP algo might be faster, more accurate, and better at recalling old cases than a judge, but you're not going to be satisfied in a society where you open a website to find out whether you're going to jail.

- Jobs where interacting with a human is the whole point. There are things where humans are baked in.

- The oldest profession is not going to be replaced with robots until those robots are mistakable for humans, as in Blade Runner. Therapists and hairdressers are probably safe, too.

- Watch any major sport. They talk about where the players grew up, what kind of mentality you need to succeed, etc. You show up at the stadium to watch gladiators, not robots. You exercise your tribal nature by buying the jersey and screaming like an idiot. You want to see John Terry crying after missing the penalty. Emotion just isn't the same without people.

Re: Humans are underrated

#9
post #3

Can't operate in vacuum. Can't operate underwater for more than 3 minutes. Can only operate in a very narrow temperature range. Needs to shut down 8 hours a day.

Can heal, can feed in many areas, can adapt and fork. Not designed for productivity.

Exactly, robots are designed for productivity and robust-ness; humans are 'designed' for adaptability and creativity.

Re: Humans are underrated

#10

The article touches on the major areas: - Jobs where we need someone to be responsible. You may have fancy diagnostic computers and automated scalpels, but you are going to want a doctor somewhere. A NLP algo might be faster, more accurate, and better at recalling old cases than a judge, but you're not going to be satisfied in a society where you open a website to find out whether you're going to jail. - Jobs where i…

If the stats were significantly better, I'd take the completely robotic "doctor" any day. Why would I want someone to be able to override what is statistically the most accurate decision? It's not like they'd be negligent if they followed the computer's decision, and if they didn't, being able to sue them doesn't make up for the fact that I could have been better treated.

The article mentions we'd prefer to have a doctor "just to talk and know we’re being heard by a human being," and I agree that could be useful, but I wouldn't need a trained doctor, more like a conscientious customer support rep.

Post reply on HN