Live data from Hacker News

Google Wants a Piece of Air-Traffic Control for Drones

bloomberg.com

21–26 of 26 posts

Re: Google Wants a Piece of Air-Traffic Control for Drones

#21
The idea of centralized air traffic control for drones seems completely backwards to me. Birds don't have air traffic control, they have eyes and a brain and avoid obstacles and each other autonomously.

Maybe there will be a need for some defined airways for drones, but they should be able to fly and navigate for themselves.

Re: Google Wants a Piece of Air-Traffic Control for Drones

#22
post #8

Retailers will be in for a lot of heartache if they hope that the FAA will "work with them." ADS-B is already mandated for 2020. The spec is cast in stone, and the only thing that could change is the month it's enforced. As we've seen with the SoCal fires last week, integrated tracking is essential for safe low-level flight. Certified ADS-B avionics prices have ranged from $10,000 - $1,000,000+. Experimental prices a…

This. Alot of drone guys or people who dream of drones forget that there's GA planes up there. I've had to dodge stupid cameras on balloons while landing. That's so dangerous

GA planes?

Re: Google Wants a Piece of Air-Traffic Control for Drones

#24
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This. Alot of drone guys or people who dream of drones forget that there's GA planes up there. I've had to dodge stupid cameras on balloons while landing. That's so dangerous

GA planes?

General aviation.

Re: Google Wants a Piece of Air-Traffic Control for Drones

#25
post #21

The idea of centralized air traffic control for drones seems completely backwards to me. Birds don't have air traffic control, they have eyes and a brain and avoid obstacles and each other autonomously. Maybe there will be a need for some defined airways for drones, but they should be able to fly and navigate for themselves.

Whilst I appreciate a bird analogy as much as the next guy (and it makes sense from a mechanical perspective), I'm not sure if it works for regulation purely because birds aren't responsible to anyone or anything else if things go wrong. Drones are human products and thus someone, ie their creator or user, would need to be held accountable.

Re: Google Wants a Piece of Air-Traffic Control for Drones

#26
post #19
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does it work at 45000'? Seems ideal to have one comm system for low and high altitudes, but at least there should be at most two and no gap in coverage.

I would think so because analog TV over the air was able to travel more then 9 miles, but I don't think that toy drones can go that high, but that will probably change...

Analog TV transmitters were using serious wattage, and it was only transmitting. Wifi will have a lot less transmission wattage and it has to have a lot or reception sensitivity and hundreds maybe thousands of clients. So it's an interesting problem.
Post reply on HN