It looks like an amount of space hard to fill with meaningful data. I wonder if they would prevent people from filling it with random junk just for fun.
Google Cloud Storage Nearline graduates to general availability
11–20 of 58 posts
Re: Google Cloud Storage Nearline graduates to general availability
#12It looks like an amount of space hard to fill with meaningful data. I wonder if they would prevent people from filling it with random junk just for fun.
Re: Google Cloud Storage Nearline graduates to general availability
#13Re: Google Cloud Storage Nearline graduates to general availability
#14Re: Google Cloud Storage Nearline graduates to general availability
#156 months of free storage is a no brainer business strategy. Once you get anywhere near 100PB of data loaded, are you really going to move it elsewhere after 6 months?
We don't have a cold storage product, so perhaps not relevant for nearline ... but it is relevant for their online options. You do have the ability to migrate to another provider.
Two random notes:
- we're announcing zfs send/recv[1] as a transport in the next few days and there will be s3-competitive pricing for this product at TB+ levels.
- "HN readers discount" is still available all these years later. Just email.
[1] over SSH
Re: Google Cloud Storage Nearline graduates to general availability
#16Re: Google Cloud Storage Nearline graduates to general availability
#17That is a pretty steep hit when you can use a lower quality object store:
https://www.runabove.com/storage/object-storage.xml
For $.01/GB and $.01/GB to pull.
Yeah, it may not be as highly available as Nearline but for the 99% of the time it is available...you don't have a 3 second delay and you aren't paying a 13x premium to pull data out.
For instance, lets say you have a 50GB backup that you automatically verify via a testing process. You don't want to burden the disks of your primary datastore longer than you have to [the source of the backup] so your workflow is:
Database Server -> Create Backup Locally -> Push Backup to Object Store Bucket [$.50/month to store the backup, assume you store 7 days] -> Spin up VM which pulls from Object Store Bucket and verifies the backup [$.06/day for an 4GB Linode for an hour to do this which is plenty of RAM and time ] -> Pull the Backup & Verify [$.50/Day]
30 Days Backup Cost:
$20.30/month to maintain a week of verified backups with RunAbove = (7 * 50 * .01) + (30 * .06) + (30 * .01 * 50)
$200.30/month to maintain a week of verified backups with Nearline = (7 * 50 * .01) + (30 * .06) + (30 * .13 * 50)
I don't know why anyone would willingly pay an order of magnitude more for cold storage.
Re: Google Cloud Storage Nearline graduates to general availability
#18I am absolutely blown away with the 100 PB for every customer... Meaning all together they must have somewhere in the exabyte to zettabyte range or are completely betting on the fact that no one will be able to/actually be willing fill this/their cloud. I guess I am just not used to the fact that on average most people have at least a 1 TB hard drive or hard drives that add up to 1 TB...
Re: Google Cloud Storage Nearline graduates to general availability
#19From the details (in an image, some in fine print on the image) on the offer: that's if you migrate at least 1PB into Google Cloud Nearline in the first 3 months, and maintain at least 1PB in Google Clound Nearline for at least 12 months. And its only 1 month free at that level of commitment; anything more than 1 month requires a migration commitment to more than the 1PB. EDIT: At the time this comment was written, t…