Earlier quoted context omitted.
If there is life there is probably bacteria and viruses. But it's unlikely they would be harmful for us. They need to match our platform.
They would need to match our platform to perform the mechanisms they have evolved for, but not necessarily to have adverse effects.
NASA announces discovery of Earth-like planet with earth similarity index 0.98
81–90 of 177 posts
Re: NASA announces discovery of Earth-like planet with earth similarity index 0.98
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
For those who also dislike timezone-juggling: http://time.is/1200_23_July_2015_in_EDT?http://www.nasa.gov/...
Thanks for sharing that. I've been looking for something like this. Traveling and juggling meetings in multiple timezones is a big source of anxiety for me. I'm always wondering if I did the math wrong or if there is a daylight savings I haven't accounted for.
Re: NASA announces discovery of Earth-like planet with earth similarity index 0.98
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think the announcement is live at noon today (EST).
For those who also dislike timezone-juggling: http://time.is/1200_23_July_2015_in_EDT?http://www.nasa.gov/...
It turns out we are, and I don't meant to suggest that GP didn't know this. But what if we weren't in daylight savings time, and GP said "EST"? Would we have to change an hour?
I highly recommend just saying "Eastern Time."
Re: NASA announces discovery of Earth-like planet with earth similarity index 0.98
#84Apparently there's already a Kepler discovered planet with an ESI of 0.98: http://phl.upr.edu/projects/habitable-exoplanets-catalog/dat... EDIT: Unless that list was literally just updated with ESI 0.98 planet this thread is referring to...
Re: NASA announces discovery of Earth-like planet with earth similarity index 0.98
#85It's interesting to note that the highest ESI so far has been Kepler-62e with a score of 0.83 ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_Similarity_Index ). So a score of 0.98 would seem significant.
Question: why is 'escape velocity' part of the Earth Similarity Index when, presumably, it's just a function of radius and density (which are also in the index)? I feel like I'm missing something.
Even so, giving a rough estimate of mean surface gravity would make the tables more accessible to non-experts.
Re: NASA announces discovery of Earth-like planet with earth similarity index 0.98
#86Okay, to make this slightly on-topic now, I am excited to hear about the discovery in about an hour and a half. Even if it was a 1.00 on the similarity scale, I'm more interested in finding out how habitable it would be for earth-like life.
Re: NASA announces discovery of Earth-like planet with earth similarity index 0.98
#87Earlier quoted context omitted.
For those who also dislike timezone-juggling: http://time.is/1200_23_July_2015_in_EDT?http://www.nasa.gov/...
People think they are being more precise by saying "EST," but, quick, are we in daylight savings time now, or out of it? It turns out we are, and I don't meant to suggest that GP didn't know this. But what if we weren't in daylight savings time, and GP said "EST"? Would we have to change an hour? I highly recommend just saying "Eastern Time."
Re: NASA announces discovery of Earth-like planet with earth similarity index 0.98
#88Earlier quoted context omitted.
"The Earth Similarity Index, ESI or "easy scale" is a measure of how physically similar a planetary-mass object is to Earth. It is a scale from zero to one, with Earth having a value of one." Mars is at 0.697, for reference. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_Similarity_Index
Well, what has a value of zero?
Mathematically you could zero out one or all of the multiplicands (e.g. with a surface temperature of 0 degrees K) but constraining oneself to the realm of the possible, you'll always have a non-zero ESI.
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_Similarity_Index#Formula...
Re: NASA announces discovery of Earth-like planet with earth similarity index 0.98
#89Re: NASA announces discovery of Earth-like planet with earth similarity index 0.98
#90Earlier quoted context omitted.
For those who also dislike timezone-juggling: http://time.is/1200_23_July_2015_in_EDT?http://www.nasa.gov/...
People think they are being more precise by saying "EST," but, quick, are we in daylight savings time now, or out of it? It turns out we are, and I don't meant to suggest that GP didn't know this. But what if we weren't in daylight savings time, and GP said "EST"? Would we have to change an hour? I highly recommend just saying "Eastern Time."