Here are some other planets we've found with comparable similarity. Note that earth-like similarity does not imply that it is habitable. http://phl.upr.edu/projects/habitable-exoplanets-catalog/dat...
A few zones some think need to overlap and be dialed-in to come close to offering a habitable place: water habitable zone ultraviolet habitable zone photosynthetic habitable zone ozone habitable zone planetary rotation rate habitable zone planetary obliquity habitable zone tidal habitable zone astrosphere habitable zone
NASA announces discovery of Earth-like planet with earth similarity index 0.98
71–80 of 177 posts
Re: NASA announces discovery of Earth-like planet with earth similarity index 0.98
#72As of now, the content linked says nothing more than the PR announcement from yesterday -- so either the title is misleading, or the OP comes from the future. (I'm aware he might have other sources for the title, but it's still misleading)
I think OP is referring to the Kepler Candidate KOI-4878.01 [0] with the ESI as 0.98.
[0]: http://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/cgi-bin/DisplayOver...
_______________________________________________________________
This post is ridiculously clickbaity! There should be a {{citation needed}} tag there or the title be changed.
Anyways, the anticipation for the 9AM PDT announcement is feverish.
Re: NASA announces discovery of Earth-like planet with earth similarity index 0.98
#73Re: NASA announces discovery of Earth-like planet with earth similarity index 0.98
#74Apparently there's already a Kepler discovered planet with an ESI of 0.98: http://phl.upr.edu/projects/habitable-exoplanets-catalog/dat... EDIT: Unless that list was literally just updated with ESI 0.98 planet this thread is referring to...
Re: NASA announces discovery of Earth-like planet with earth similarity index 0.98
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
"The Earth Similarity Index, ESI or "easy scale" is a measure of how physically similar a planetary-mass object is to Earth. It is a scale from zero to one, with Earth having a value of one." Mars is at 0.697, for reference. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_Similarity_Index
Well, what has a value of zero?
If something has all of those properties, then because of the way it's defined, it has an ESI which is strictly > 0 and Incidentally, the formulation of the ESI is a good generic formula for creating 'similarity' measurements for, for example, matchmaking algorithms or similarity searches.
Re: NASA announces discovery of Earth-like planet with earth similarity index 0.98
#76As of now, the content linked says nothing more than the PR announcement from yesterday -- so either the title is misleading, or the OP comes from the future. (I'm aware he might have other sources for the title, but it's still misleading)
Edit: I think OP is referring to the Kepler Candidate KOI-4878.01 [0] with the ESI as 0.98. [0]: http://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/cgi-bin/DisplayOver... _______________________________________________________________ This post is ridiculously clickbaity! There should be a {{citation needed}} tag there or the title be changed. Anyways, the anticipation for the 9AM PDT announcement is feverish.
Re: NASA announces discovery of Earth-like planet with earth similarity index 0.98
#77If there is life on that planet, I wonder if it would be similar enough to host infectious diseases. I know the Apollo team was quarantined when they got back from the moon. As someone living on a continent that has undergone one apocalypse, I hope we have a similar procedure to prevent the spread of spacepox.
Re: NASA announces discovery of Earth-like planet with earth similarity index 0.98
#78Re: NASA announces discovery of Earth-like planet with earth similarity index 0.98
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hey, you guys remember swatch beats?
Am I the only one who that that beats was actually a pretty decent, if totally doomed, idea? cricket noises
Re: NASA announces discovery of Earth-like planet with earth similarity index 0.98
#80As of now, the content linked says nothing more than the PR announcement from yesterday -- so either the title is misleading, or the OP comes from the future. (I'm aware he might have other sources for the title, but it's still misleading)