The timeline is weird.
1. https://medium.com/@bchesky/7-rejections-7d894cbaa084
2. https://arenavc.com/2015/07/airbnb-my-1-billion-lesson/
3. http://www.quora.com/How-much-money-did-Airbnb-raise-What-is...
41–50 of 149 posts
The timeline is weird.
1. https://medium.com/@bchesky/7-rejections-7d894cbaa084
2. https://arenavc.com/2015/07/airbnb-my-1-billion-lesson/
3. http://www.quora.com/How-much-money-did-Airbnb-raise-What-is...
If it's bad form for a VC to break a handshake deal, it's equally-bad for a startup too... no? Doesn't that reflect poorly upon the founders? It's so important that YC went through the effort to codify the process: http://www.ycombinator.com/handshake/
He's known for being bold and writing checks on a first meeting. Why didn't he write a check to Airbnb after months of haggling? YC, or any other investor, was free to come along and close the deal at any moment. The way an investor claims a deal is with their checkbook (or a signed term sheet). He learned his lesson and realizes his mistake. Airbnb did nothing wrong.
Let me get this straight: in June 2008, Airbnb got intro'd to a bunch of investors, who all said no [1]. In September of 2008, Airbnb had a $250k round on the table that valued them at 2.5M[2]. And then, also in September 2008 (before YC usually does interviews) they rejected that offer for YC, who ended up giving them $20k[3], with a valuation presumably around $250k?? (Although Brian Chesky says that didn't happen…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not all contracts... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statute_of_frauds
Wow, thanks for the link. That's really interesting. Most of those seemed like pretty obvious safety stops, except for the $500 in goods maximum. That one sort of renders verbal contracts useless in nearly all cases, unless I'm misunderstanding.
What bugs me is that the founders went back on the deal that was agreed upon in person.
I hear you. I get that a deal isn't final until it's in writing (i.e. signed), but whatever happened to integrity?
My basic understanding is that deals are complete when signed off. Where's the lack of integrity in that?
What bugs me is that the founders went back on the deal that was agreed upon in person.
A deal ain't a deal till its signed off. I make deals and negotiate all the time and I've negotiated thousands of times. It's a very good sign when you have a verbal agreement but you're a fool if you think that's a finished deal. It's the quick and the dead - if people are serious about a deal then they need to move quickly, wrap it up and sign it. If you are selling something (yourself, your company, shares in your…
exactly, you see this with recruitment.. when a company meets the right candidate they move very fast...
Anytime I did interviews, I had a 24 hr deadline for me to mentally strike out a option. Everytime I got a job, I was contacted almost within an 1-2 hr of doing the interview.
Any delays means they other party has other good options, same applies IMO here as well..
So in this case unless they sign on the dotted line pronto and give a cheque, things are still up in the air