Reality: $500M in revenue in 2014
Moral: Even the most successful startups don't hit their seed-stage revenue projections :)
31–40 of 149 posts
Reality: $500M in revenue in 2014
Moral: Even the most successful startups don't hit their seed-stage revenue projections :)
What bugs me is that the founders went back on the deal that was agreed upon in person.
I get that a deal isn't final until it's in writing (i.e. signed), but whatever happened to integrity?
If it's bad form for a VC to break a handshake deal, it's equally-bad for a startup too... no? Doesn't that reflect poorly upon the founders? It's so important that YC went through the effort to codify the process: http://www.ycombinator.com/handshake/
The codified "handshake" process, you'll notice, has a written step and includes a core element of contract formation: offer & acceptance. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Offer_and_acceptance IANAL, TINLA.
I'm gonna go out on a limb and assume that the investor already possessed emails saying "Let's do this" with numbers in it. Is that different than a signed term sheet? You bet -- it's not legally binding! But it also meets all the requirements of the gentleman's agreement -- aka YC Handshake protocol:
1. The investor says “I’m in for [offer].”
2. The startup says “Ok, you’re in for [offer].”
3. The startup sends the investor an email or text message saying “This is to confirm you’re in for [offer].”
4. The investor replies yes.
What bugs me is that the founders went back on the deal that was agreed upon in person.
He was gazumped by a much shinier offer because he had nothing in writing. He concluded that he needs to move faster on the big picture, rather than haggling the correct protocol for picking of nits.
I sense the founders used the VC as leverage. They had a closing dinner the night before and shook on it. The VC was reasonable to expect the paperwork to be finalised the next day.
YC changing their mind at the very next day sounds very convenient...
If it's bad form for a VC to break a handshake deal, it's equally-bad for a startup too... no? Doesn't that reflect poorly upon the founders? It's so important that YC went through the effort to codify the process: http://www.ycombinator.com/handshake/
Now, this particular VC has only raised about 800mm, so I don't know if that makes them a Tier-1 VC, but it still made me realize that you don't ever know until the money is in the bank account.
Thankfully, Foundation Capital (an awesome Tier-1 VC), stepped up and kept us running/covered payroll and rent, until we found someone else to get money from.
It's very interesting hearing a story from the VC's side. One always reads about the trials and tribulations of startups trying to raise capital, but I've never considered that there might be similar issues and competition on the investors' side.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The codified "handshake" process, you'll notice, has a written step and includes a core element of contract formation: offer & acceptance. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Offer_and_acceptance IANAL, TINLA.
FTA: "At the end of September, we agreed on terms and I flew up to San Francisco to do a closing dinner at a little café next to Brainwash. We had some good food and wine and I thought things were solid. We shook hands and planned to formally close the investment the next day." I'm gonna go out on a limb and assume that the investor already possessed emails saying "Let's do this" with numbers in it. Is that different…
On the tangent of the protocol as the protocol, I also note that it is meant to be exclusive. That is, you don't construct it by piecing together the individual events -- it's written as a once off 2-phase transaction with no other intervening steps to prevent shenanigans and mistakes.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
He was gazumped by a much shinier offer because he had nothing in writing. He concluded that he needs to move faster on the big picture, rather than haggling the correct protocol for picking of nits.
That's not what I get from the story though. I sense the founders used the VC as leverage. They had a closing dinner the night before and shook on it. The VC was reasonable to expect the paperwork to be finalised the next day. YC changing their mind at the very next day sounds very convenient...
Edit: I seem to have touched a nerve, but I don't know what it is. Can someone explain what I said that caused annoyance? I have the usual embarrassing secret obsession with made up internet points.
Its an interesting read to hear about other investors who have missed out on deals. I actually tried investing into a startup this year and completely failed due to governmental regulations. Even though i worked my ass off saving for 2 years to have discretionary income in order to invest as i wanted to I did not meet the requirements of being an "accredited investor" and so i missed out on the funding round. I spent…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
A deal ain't a deal till its signed off. I make deals and negotiate all the time and I've negotiated thousands of times. It's a very good sign when you have a verbal agreement but you're a fool if you think that's a finished deal. It's the quick and the dead - if people are serious about a deal then they need to move quickly, wrap it up and sign it. If you are selling something (yourself, your company, shares in your…
A verbal contract is just as legally binding as a written contract. It's just that most people don't have authorized audio/video recordings of these kinds of interactions.