IronNode – Debug Node.js code with Chrome Developer Tools
1–10 of 25 posts
Re: IronNode – Debug Node.js code with Chrome Developer Tools
#2Re: IronNode – Debug Node.js code with Chrome Developer Tools
#3Re: IronNode – Debug Node.js code with Chrome Developer Tools
#4How is this any different than: https://github.com/node-inspector/node-inspector
Re: IronNode – Debug Node.js code with Chrome Developer Tools
#5How is this any different than: https://github.com/node-inspector/node-inspector
Re: IronNode – Debug Node.js code with Chrome Developer Tools
#6Re: IronNode – Debug Node.js code with Chrome Developer Tools
#7Isn't using it for this project going to cause confusion?
Re: IronNode – Debug Node.js code with Chrome Developer Tools
#8How is this any different than: https://github.com/node-inspector/node-inspector
Node inspector has a lot of problems. Buggy as shit. And it's time consuming to use the -brk param to make ur app stop on the first line and then attach node inspector, and then switch back to having it not stop on line 1 when testing ongoing calls. That's why it is important what this guy built to automatically attach itself, even if all the other node inspector bugs still exist. It's particularly hard to find ur fi…
Re: IronNode – Debug Node.js code with Chrome Developer Tools
#9I thought the Iron* moniker was conventionally reserved for things running on .net (It Runs On Net), like IronPython, IronRuby, IronLisp, IronScheme, etc? Isn't using it for this project going to cause confusion?
Re: IronNode – Debug Node.js code with Chrome Developer Tools
#10I thought the Iron* moniker was conventionally reserved for things running on .net (It Runs On Net), like IronPython, IronRuby, IronLisp, IronScheme, etc? Isn't using it for this project going to cause confusion?
I was going to make a snarky remark comparing it to the recent second usage of 'isomorphic' but, to be honest, people will figure it out. I'm putting all this stuff on my list of things not to waste blood pressure on.
But if his project from name alone is perceived as being related to .NET, he may not reach out to the full audience of web-developers he may be aiming for. And that's a net loss for him.
If there's a time to reconsider the name, it's now before it gets bigger and more "known". I mean the repo only has around 10 commits at this point :)