Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Echochamber.js

github.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

61–69 of 69 posts

Re: Echochamber.js

#61

Post by pyre »

pablasso wrote: post #57
unethical_ban wrote: post #42

So many one-liner garbage comments, no way to downvote. Let's start by saying: cool, it's satire, and learning technologies through novel applications is the heart of hacking. I ain't even mad. But no, shadowbanning is not cool. It was originally for spammers, not for real people you don't like. It's inconsiderate, because if effective, it wastes peoples' time writing comments they think people can read. Comments the…

You need more reputation to be able to downvote.

I don't think that @unethical_ban is talking about downvoting the comments, but downvoting the submission itself. There is no "downvote" option for submissions, only upvote and flag.

Re: Echochamber.js

#62

Post by unethical_ban »

pyre wrote: post #61
pablasso wrote: post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You need more reputation to be able to downvote.

I don't think that @unethical_ban is talking about downvoting the comments, but downvoting the submission itself. There is no "downvote" option for submissions, only upvote and flag.

oh no, I was talking about comments. And the parent is right, it comes along once you have enough karma.

Re: Echochamber.js

#63

Post by bbcbasic »

phn wrote: post #31
nacs wrote: post #27

It doesn't degrade gracefully on my Lynx browser and doesn't use any form of encryption when submitting comments, making it vulnerable to 3-letter agency interception.

I don't know if you're being sarcastic, but you realize it doesn't actually submit anything, right?

No in-memory encryption though. In-brain encryption is the workaround, just type the resulting base64 into the input field.

Re: Echochamber.js

#64

Post by pyre »

unethical_ban wrote: post #62
pyre wrote: post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think that @unethical_ban is talking about downvoting the comments, but downvoting the submission itself. There is no "downvote" option for submissions, only upvote and flag.

oh no, I was talking about comments. And the parent is right, it comes along once you have enough karma.

> And the parent is right, it comes along once you have enough karma.

Yes, but only for comments, not for article submissions.

Re: Echochamber.js

#66

Post by etherealG »

unethical_ban wrote: post #42

So many one-liner garbage comments, no way to downvote. Let's start by saying: cool, it's satire, and learning technologies through novel applications is the heart of hacking. I ain't even mad. But no, shadowbanning is not cool. It was originally for spammers, not for real people you don't like. It's inconsiderate, because if effective, it wastes peoples' time writing comments they think people can read. Comments the…

how did you eventually find out about the ban out of interest?
Post reply on HN