Great stuff, I've been using iTerm2 for a while and it's really good to see it evolve like this. I use screen a lot (yes I know, I should switch to tmux one day!) and shell integration doesn't seem to work properly with sessions inside screen. Works perfectly if I ssh directly. Is it going to be supported eventually or is this the ultimate signal for me to switch to tmux?
iTerm2 Shell Integration
31–40 of 102 posts
Re: iTerm2 Shell Integration
#32I'm concerned about the wget to an external server part. This file should be local to prevent excessive slowness and potential security issues. Also, is there a zsh version of this file? zsh is extremely popular on osx.
The linked page explains how to install by hand. I'd like to eliminate the curl|bash. It's tricky to deploy a shell script in a terminal emulator, so it hasn't been done yet. The ability to fix bugs without making users upgrade their client has been invaluable during early beta.
Re: iTerm2 Shell Integration
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
What do you use ProxyCommand for? It seems hard to support, but I'd like to know more.
I've used it in the past to ssh via bastion hosts and the like.
# proxy n02 connections through bastion
host n02.university.edu
ProxyCommand ssh bastion.university.edu -W %h:%p 2> /dev/null
Almost all my remote shells require a similar setup.Re: iTerm2 Shell Integration
#34I'd love to use a terminal with similar features on linux
It's really interesting how OS X is the one that has a terminal emulator with the most features out there.
iTerm2 now comes with 24-bit colors, command completion popup, notifications, triggers, profiles, mouseless copy, split panes, search, and you can even have inline images/gifs all out of the box with zero or minimal configuration required. That's just awesome.
All of these features and iTerm2 still feels much faster than Terminator to me.
Re: iTerm2 Shell Integration
#35I'm here to answer questions anyone has about this. It's a newish feature so feedback is welcome, and bug reports are greatly appreciated. Also, credit goes to FinalTerm for the inspiration. RIP.
As an iterm2 and fish shell user I appreciate the work you guys are doing on bringing this to fish. Thank you! :)
Re: iTerm2 Shell Integration
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not exactly an iTerm2 clone but pretty close conemu https://code.google.com/p/conemu-maximus5/
+1 for conemu. It's approach and direction seem to be different than iTerm2, but still a must have on Windows.
Re: iTerm2 Shell Integration
#37I'd love to see something like iTerm for Windows.
http://www.hanselman.com/blog/Windows10GetsAFreshCommandProm...
Re: iTerm2 Shell Integration
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm using a german keyboard and the shortcut cmd-; is inaccessible because ';' is shift-, I couldn't find a way to customise the shortcut in options. Sorry if I was too stupid to find it. Great work otherwise.
Same here in Norway (and the entire Scandinavia).
"\e\e[D": backward-word
"\e\e[C": forward-word
I'd love to switch to an american keyboard, because lots of Unix things seems impossible to type with my current keyboard, but maybe I am just being stupid.Re: iTerm2 Shell Integration
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
Except that it doesn't shell out, so it ignores ProxyCommand...
What do you use ProxyCommand for? It seems hard to support, but I'd like to know more.
Re: iTerm2 Shell Integration
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
Same here in Norway (and the entire Scandinavia).
Lots of stuff seems broken by default if you are on an exotic layout. I am on a Macbook with a Danish-layout, and ALT+ARROW_LEFT/ARROW_RIGHT doesn't work out of the box in iterm2, however it seems to work if you rebind, or type this into .inputrc: "\e\e[D": backward-word "\e\e[C": forward-word I'd love to switch to an american keyboard, because lots of Unix things seems impossible to type with my current keyboard, bu…