Live data from Hacker News

Soloshot: Automatically film outdoor activities without a camera operator

shop.soloshot.com

31–40 of 175 posts

Re: Soloshot: Automatically film outdoor activities without a camera operator

#31
post #6

From the FAQs: Does SOLOSHOT2 work indoors? Not yet. SOLOSHOT is currently an outdoor only product due to some of the technologies involved. Anybody know why this is the case?

An educated guess would be that it uses GPS for location. It is often not possible to get a lock on the satellites indoors.

They're working on it however: http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/126843-think-gps-is-cool-...

Re: Soloshot: Automatically film outdoor activities without a camera operator

#32

This is begging for an API or open source firmware. Impressive technology applied to something with limited practical usefulness. For starters, I'd like to decouple the tracking system from the tags.

I'd cheerfully pay sticker price for just the tracking system, no tripod required (assuming I hadn't overspent on media gadgetry already this quarter, anyway).

I would too, but I want to track things I can't put a tag onto. Wildlife, cars speeding past my house. If I could hook it up to an arduino with infrared sensors that would be awesome.

Re: Soloshot: Automatically film outdoor activities without a camera operator

#34

Looks to be an amazing piece of engineering but seriously, what's the usecase? It looks to be targeted at the amateur market ('shoot like the pros') and I just don't see the demand or workability in this space. To pick on a few hinted at on the page: A game of football: Leaving a camera on a tripod on the sideline while I'm focused on the game? Not in any park I've ever played in. Taking the stick from my teammates f…

A few drone flying things that are sort of similar:

https://hexoplus.com/

https://www.airdog.com/

https://www.lily.camera/

I'm not sure these are the ones I originally read about, so there may be a few more.

This would probably work better for the skiing/hiking/other type case, provided the drone doesn't fly into something or drown.

I like that it can do the motion time lapse thing too though and it obviously would have a lot more run time.

Re: Soloshot: Automatically film outdoor activities without a camera operator

#37
post #17

Looks to be an amazing piece of engineering but seriously, what's the usecase? It looks to be targeted at the amateur market ('shoot like the pros') and I just don't see the demand or workability in this space. To pick on a few hinted at on the page: A game of football: Leaving a camera on a tripod on the sideline while I'm focused on the game? Not in any park I've ever played in. Taking the stick from my teammates f…

> A game of football: Leaving a camera on a tripod on the sideline while I'm focused on the game? Not in any park I've ever played in. Taking the stick from my teammates for being enough of a nerd to set this up? If it's affordable, I can see this being big with parents and coaches of youth athletes. Go to a children's soccer game (or ice hockey here in Canada) and see how many parents have their cameras out, but wou…

A lot of people for training also like to be able to record themselves and see what they need to work on. Often times you're alone training in a field or something and it could be nice to have the camera follow you.

Re: Soloshot: Automatically film outdoor activities without a camera operator

#38

Looks to be an amazing piece of engineering but seriously, what's the usecase? It looks to be targeted at the amateur market ('shoot like the pros') and I just don't see the demand or workability in this space. To pick on a few hinted at on the page: A game of football: Leaving a camera on a tripod on the sideline while I'm focused on the game? Not in any park I've ever played in. Taking the stick from my teammates f…

I could see an artist doing timelapse of their art project using this. Although I'm not sure they'd need the tracking ...

How about a construction site timelapse? Again, not sure about needing the tracking...

The autotracking timelapse was the most interesting part, maybe for a really slow moving _thing_, but I can't think of one...

Re: Soloshot: Automatically film outdoor activities without a camera operator

#39

Looks to be an amazing piece of engineering but seriously, what's the usecase? It looks to be targeted at the amateur market ('shoot like the pros') and I just don't see the demand or workability in this space. To pick on a few hinted at on the page: A game of football: Leaving a camera on a tripod on the sideline while I'm focused on the game? Not in any park I've ever played in. Taking the stick from my teammates f…

Have you ever seen the average non-professional try to work a camera to follow any kind of motion? So maybe in cases where it's likely that your camera will walk off, you leave somebody to guard the whole rig—this thing looks like it will almost certainly take a better video or series of photos than the average person.

Re: Soloshot: Automatically film outdoor activities without a camera operator

#40
Not the same but there exists a microphone which can be thought of as an audio version of this: https://www.acousticmagic.com/ It senses the direction of the speaker and outputs audio from that direction filtering out audio from other directions. As different speakers in different locations speak it changes the direction it uses. It also outputs a location signal that can be used by software to, for example, have a computer position a camera toward the current speaker. (I don't have one - this is just based on the material I have read.)
Post reply on HN