Live data from Hacker News

Soloshot: Automatically film outdoor activities without a camera operator

shop.soloshot.com

11–20 of 175 posts

Re: Soloshot: Automatically film outdoor activities without a camera operator

#11
post #6

From the FAQs: Does SOLOSHOT2 work indoors? Not yet. SOLOSHOT is currently an outdoor only product due to some of the technologies involved. Anybody know why this is the case?

An educated guess would be that it uses GPS for location. It is often not possible to get a lock on the satellites indoors.

Re: Soloshot: Automatically film outdoor activities without a camera operator

#12
Looks to be an amazing piece of engineering but seriously, what's the usecase? It looks to be targeted at the amateur market ('shoot like the pros') and I just don't see the demand or workability in this space.

To pick on a few hinted at on the page:

A game of football: Leaving a camera on a tripod on the sideline while I'm focused on the game? Not in any park I've ever played in. Taking the stick from my teammates for being enough of a nerd to set this up?

Skiing: Putting a camera on a tripod, unattended, on the piste? Then get the lift up to the top so you can ski back down towards the camera? Again, I can't see this ending well for the poor old camera.

Dirt biking/other extreme sports: because people often do these alone, and so need an automated cameraman to get any filming done?

EDIT: reading some of these comments my opinion has changed, there are more compelling use cases for this than I first thought of (like letting the person who would have done the filming relax and watch the event, whilst still attending to the camera, that's a great one). This is amazing tech but the main limiting factor for now is the risk of leaving such expensive equipment unattended. When the price falls I have no doubt this will be an extremely widely used tech, as widely used as cameras themselves are now.

Re: Soloshot: Automatically film outdoor activities without a camera operator

#14

Looks to be an amazing piece of engineering but seriously, what's the usecase? It looks to be targeted at the amateur market ('shoot like the pros') and I just don't see the demand or workability in this space. To pick on a few hinted at on the page: A game of football: Leaving a camera on a tripod on the sideline while I'm focused on the game? Not in any park I've ever played in. Taking the stick from my teammates f…

People like to take photos and videos of themselves. You don't need a reason, just some vanity. These will sell like hotcakes.

Re: Soloshot: Automatically film outdoor activities without a camera operator

#15

Looks to be an amazing piece of engineering but seriously, what's the usecase? It looks to be targeted at the amateur market ('shoot like the pros') and I just don't see the demand or workability in this space. To pick on a few hinted at on the page: A game of football: Leaving a camera on a tripod on the sideline while I'm focused on the game? Not in any park I've ever played in. Taking the stick from my teammates f…

I think you're being a bit too pessimistic. As an amateur athlete, I can definitely see the utility (albeit limited) in this. There are lots of parks in my area (I live in Ottawa... obviously this is location specific) where I could set this up and not worry about it being stolen. And I wouldn't set this up for a game, but it would be useful while practicing/training - and my teammates would not give me shit about it.

I can't comment much on the other use cases that you've gone over, but as an amateur athlete this is totally something I could use. That said, I would rather rent this than own it.

Re: Soloshot: Automatically film outdoor activities without a camera operator

#16
post #5

It's a good product until your camera weights more than 1kg...

that won't matter for most use cases. the heavier the camera setup the more likely manual control is desired or required anyway. this is more for set-and-forget kind of shooting. On the video they've got a good size DSLR with an autofocus lens on it. If it can carry that, it's gonna work for people.

Re: Soloshot: Automatically film outdoor activities without a camera operator

#17

Looks to be an amazing piece of engineering but seriously, what's the usecase? It looks to be targeted at the amateur market ('shoot like the pros') and I just don't see the demand or workability in this space. To pick on a few hinted at on the page: A game of football: Leaving a camera on a tripod on the sideline while I'm focused on the game? Not in any park I've ever played in. Taking the stick from my teammates f…

> A game of football: Leaving a camera on a tripod on the sideline while I'm focused on the game? Not in any park I've ever played in. Taking the stick from my teammates for being enough of a nerd to set this up?

If it's affordable, I can see this being big with parents and coaches of youth athletes. Go to a children's soccer game (or ice hockey here in Canada) and see how many parents have their cameras out, but would rather be relaxing on their lawn chair than making sure they are catching all the action.

Re: Soloshot: Automatically film outdoor activities without a camera operator

#18
post #6

From the FAQs: Does SOLOSHOT2 work indoors? Not yet. SOLOSHOT is currently an outdoor only product due to some of the technologies involved. Anybody know why this is the case?

I would theorize that they have GPS in both units, and the tag sends its position to the base. Along with a compass, you can pretty accurately tell where the camera is looking, and you can probably gauge the distance between the tag and camera by the time it takes for the signal to travel to the camera, but I'm not sure how that's useful.

Re: Soloshot: Automatically film outdoor activities without a camera operator

#19

Looks to be an amazing piece of engineering but seriously, what's the usecase? It looks to be targeted at the amateur market ('shoot like the pros') and I just don't see the demand or workability in this space. To pick on a few hinted at on the page: A game of football: Leaving a camera on a tripod on the sideline while I'm focused on the game? Not in any park I've ever played in. Taking the stick from my teammates f…

People like to take photos and videos of themselves. You don't need a reason, just some vanity. These will sell like hotcakes.

Sure, I guess the main thing it comes down to is cost, and likelihood of the camera being stolen or damaged when left unattended.

It's fundamentally very cool and if it was cheap enough to be essentially throw away, or at least pretty easily replaceable, I think there would be a massive demand. But that won't be true for a long time.

Post reply on HN