Live data from Hacker News

A successful academic faces lifelong debt

chronicle.com

51–60 of 64 posts

Re: A successful academic faces lifelong debt

#51
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How dare you. This person did work to get where she is - did you miss all the stuff about working as a waitress and a cleaner? Obviously, you don't consider Native American studies valuable because it's a field with limited commercial application. And so you equate this perceived lack of value with a lack of willingness on her part to do any work, a faulty syllogism if ever I've seen one. I understand that you believ…

You misinterpreted his last sentence. He didn't mean "I work for a living, you don't." He meant "Since both of us come from backgrounds which requires us to work to get through school, we need to pick areas of study that will pay enough to support us."

As shown elsewhere, teaching computer science doesn't seem to pay all that well either. I think the real problem here is not her chosen field of study but the fact that wages have no kept place with inflation in recent years.

I could go on, but I won't...I don't want this to turn into a Reddit-style argument. My basic position is that undervaluing teaching as a service undermines our educational productivity and long-term economic growth, through excess focus on short-term dividends at the expense of cumulative value.

Re: A successful academic faces lifelong debt

#52
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You misinterpreted his last sentence. He didn't mean "I work for a living, you don't." He meant "Since both of us come from backgrounds which requires us to work to get through school, we need to pick areas of study that will pay enough to support us."

As shown elsewhere, teaching computer science doesn't seem to pay all that well either. I think the real problem here is not her chosen field of study but the fact that wages have no kept place with inflation in recent years. I could go on, but I won't...I don't want this to turn into a Reddit-style argument. My basic position is that undervaluing teaching as a service undermines our educational productivity and long…

Note that I didn't defend his statement, I clarified what he meant.

But I have to disagree with your first point. I point out elsewhere in this thread that there is a $30k gap between starting salaries for CS and History. Your conclusion may be true (wages have not tracked inflation), but it is not supported by the point you made.

Also keep in mind there are two kinds of professors: professors with research expectations, and professors with only teaching obligations. All professors at my school will have research expectations. Some colleges (often referred to as "teaching colleges," which is sadly not redundant) have no research expectations of their professors, but will pay less.

Re: A successful academic faces lifelong debt

#53
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Even the poorest American have boundless opportunities. Unfortunately most people chose not to take these opportunities and then demand equality of outcome.

Even the poorest American have boundless opportunities. You know nothing about poverty. Unfortunately most people chose not to take these opportunities and then demand equality of outcome. Almost no one expects or even wants "equality of outcome", but we do want a world where people are free from worries about health care (due to our third-world health care system) and meeting basic needs. You simply have a better so…

> You know nothing about poverty.

I grew up in a relatively poor family in a third world country (in a rural area). So, don't make baseless assumptions.

> but we do want a world where people are free from worries about health care (due to our third-world health care system) and meeting basic needs.

These (healthcare, education, etc...) are privileges. You are lucky to have it – but it is still a privilege and not something that you can demand. Btw, Europeans go to the USA for advanced health care (such as Cancer treatment). Ever heard of the MD Anderson cancer centre? It is the best in the world.

Guess what, hospitals and doctors do not just pop into existence. They have to be paid and everything costs money. You want all this to be free (at least for you). I am quite sceptical of this – someone has to pay for it. It looks like everyone wants free healthcare and no-one wants to pay for it.

> You simply have a better society (more innovation, more creativity, happier and healthier people) if peoples' lives aren't clogged up by maintenance.

It seems that the list of entitlements only gets longer and the list of responsibilities gets shorter.

Wasn’t the USA founded on the principle that everyone can pursue their happiness? It seems more like you want government to guarantee it. I think that this says more about the current generation of young Americans than of the American system.

Re: A successful academic faces lifelong debt

#54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Her work does not benefit others very much as demonstrated by their revealed preferences: no one is willing to pay her much for her teaching. I'm saying that we'd be better off as a society if most people who want to become scholars in Native American Studies don't do it, and become nurses instead. Less fun for them, but great for those of us who want the services of a nurse more than the services of a professor. We…

Again, your syllogism is faulty. You assume her work is fairly valued in exact proportion to the income it generates. But what of the possibility that her department's revenues subsidize the high cost of other departments, such as physics labs or in-demand business speakers? It's not cheap to participate in a program like this, especially not at a decent school. If there was very low demand, you would expect this to…

In general, at research universities, it's physics which subsidizes humanities. The university takes about half of every grant as overhead - i.e., science pays for the rest of the university.

As for my thesis that she's paid poorly because she is having fun, that's the situation for all academics (including myself). If she is truly underpaid relative to the fun of her job, why doesn't she quit and find higher paying work elsewhere? In fact, why do so many people apply for such jobs, when so few actually are accepted?

Hint: she likes her 3 months summer vacation, flexible work hours, relaxed environment, complete freedom to work on whatever she likes, and the possibility of never-get-fired-ever job security.

Re: A successful academic faces lifelong debt

#55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Again, your syllogism is faulty. You assume her work is fairly valued in exact proportion to the income it generates. But what of the possibility that her department's revenues subsidize the high cost of other departments, such as physics labs or in-demand business speakers? It's not cheap to participate in a program like this, especially not at a decent school. If there was very low demand, you would expect this to…

In general, at research universities, it's physics which subsidizes humanities. The university takes about half of every grant as overhead - i.e., science pays for the rest of the university. As for my thesis that she's paid poorly because she is having fun, that's the situation for all academics (including myself). If she is truly underpaid relative to the fun of her job, why doesn't she quit and find higher paying…

There's also the notion that people pick up in grad school that any job outside of research is somehow failure.

Re: A successful academic faces lifelong debt

#56
While I empathize with the difficulties she surmounted, I think it not good to be ashamed of where you came from. To the contrary, attaining the recognition that she did starting with the humble beginnings should be something to feel proud of.

Re: A successful academic faces lifelong debt

#57
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Even the poorest American have boundless opportunities. You know nothing about poverty. Unfortunately most people chose not to take these opportunities and then demand equality of outcome. Almost no one expects or even wants "equality of outcome", but we do want a world where people are free from worries about health care (due to our third-world health care system) and meeting basic needs. You simply have a better so…

> You know nothing about poverty. I grew up in a relatively poor family in a third world country (in a rural area). So, don't make baseless assumptions. > but we do want a world where people are free from worries about health care (due to our third-world health care system) and meeting basic needs. These (healthcare, education, etc...) are privileges. You are lucky to have it – but it is still a privilege and not som…

I grew up in a relatively poor family in a third world country (in a rural area). So, don't make baseless assumptions.

Correction: You know nothing about poverty in the United States.

These (healthcare, education, etc...) are privileges. You are lucky to have it – but it is still a privilege and not something that you can demand.

The discrete right/privilege distinction is a meaningless distraction from the more subjective issue of social justice. If the resources exist to give everyone healthcare, then everyone should have healthcare. If the resources don't exist, well... there's no such thing as a right to something that doesn't exist. Obviously, no one has the right to live to be 200. On the other hand, we shouldn't have people dying of third-world diseases in the U.S. just to keep insurance bureaucrats rich; that's not a reasonable trade-off.

Guess what, hospitals and doctors do not just pop into existence. They have to be paid and everything costs money. You want all this to be free (at least for you).

Wrong. I want to pay for it through the tax system. We're spending trillions on "defense"; why not spend money to be defended against things like cancer, which are far more likely to kill most of us than any terrorist?

It looks like everyone wants free healthcare and no-one wants to pay for it.

Ridiculous assertion. No one with half a brain considers that possible. Someone has to pay.

It seems that the list of entitlements only gets longer and the list of responsibilities gets shorter.

That's what happens as society improves. On the list of responsibilities shrinking: are you arguing that we should go back to an era when people spent a substantial fraction of their time making their own clothes, instead of buying cheap factory-made clothing at the store?

Wasn’t the USA founded on the principle that everyone can pursue their happiness? It seems more like you want government to guarantee it.

The idea that the government could guarantee anything about a person's emotional state is patently ridiculous, and you know this.

Also, how can someone pursue happiness if he can't afford treatment for basic medical conditions, and can't work because, untreated, that condition is too painful? People wouldn't get into messes like this in a more reasonable society.

Re: A successful academic faces lifelong debt

#58
post #2

Maybe being an assistant professor of Native American studies is a lifestyle choice to be indulged in by people who are either married to or descended from people who did commercially valuable work? The engineering department has spots available for us kids who have to work for a living.

How dare you. This person did work to get where she is - did you miss all the stuff about working as a waitress and a cleaner? Obviously, you don't consider Native American studies valuable because it's a field with limited commercial application. And so you equate this perceived lack of value with a lack of willingness on her part to do any work, a faulty syllogism if ever I've seen one. I understand that you believ…

Apologies, time zone differences mean I went to bed before I saw this.

For what its worth, I have a cultural studies degree that cost me six figures. (They had a buy one, get one free deal when I got a degree that had typically results in a career.) I'm going to punt on the question of whether Native American studies is valuable or not. Its sort of like ballet dancing -- I don't have any need for it myself, but don't have any malice in my heart for people who like it. (The question of whether it is commercially valuable or not is an empirical one. Empirically, it just isn't.)

I understand that she did a lot of work to get her degree in a commercially suboptimal field and lifestyle career in churning out more holders of degrees in the same field. She thinks that, rather than having to have slaved so hard for that, I should have to slave so hard for that -- read her last paragraph where she wants society to recalibrate its priorities (i.e. tax folks to pay her to get the schooling to do the job that too many people want to do and too few people want to pay for).

Re: A successful academic faces lifelong debt

#59
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> You know nothing about poverty. I grew up in a relatively poor family in a third world country (in a rural area). So, don't make baseless assumptions. > but we do want a world where people are free from worries about health care (due to our third-world health care system) and meeting basic needs. These (healthcare, education, etc...) are privileges. You are lucky to have it – but it is still a privilege and not som…

I grew up in a relatively poor family in a third world country (in a rural area). So, don't make baseless assumptions. Correction: You know nothing about poverty in the United States. These (healthcare, education, etc...) are privileges. You are lucky to have it – but it is still a privilege and not something that you can demand. The discrete right/privilege distinction is a meaningless distraction from the more subj…

> Correction: You know nothing about poverty in the United States.

I guess America is special then.

> The discrete right/privilege distinction is a meaningless distraction from the more subjective issue of social justice.

The word “social justice” is a misnomer for a list of entitlements and an enforcement of equality of outcome.

> If the resources exist to give everyone healthcare, then everyone should have healthcare.

The only problem you face is that these “resources” belong to private individuals. So you only have to coerce these “resources” away from them and somehow force them to keep working and creating these resources.

One guy once said what you are trying to implement: “From each according to his ability and to each according to his need”. Was it Marx?

> spending trillions on "defense"; why not spend money to be defended against things like cancer, which are far more likely to kill most of us than any terrorist?

You are justifying one bad idea with another bad idea. This is a stupid line of reasoning. For a government with an incredibly large amount of debt, it is not a good idea to spend trillions on anything.

> > It looks like everyone wants free healthcare and no-one wants to pay for it. > Ridiculous assertion. No one with half a brain considers that possible. Someone has to pay.

Yes. And the answer is always, “not us”. The argument is usually that “rich people” will pay for it.

> > It seems that the list of entitlements only gets longer and the list of responsibilities gets shorter. > That's what happens as society improves.

Now, that is when society declines and decays.

> On the list of responsibilities shrinking: are you arguing that we should go back to an era when people spent a substantial fraction of their time making their own clothes, instead of buying cheap factory-made clothing at the store?

This has nothing to do with government entitlements or personal responsibilities and duties. Here are some example responsibilities and duties:

- Save for your retirement (don’t push this duty on the government).

- Save to send your children to school and hopefully university.

- Raise your children well.

- Volunteer to become an army reservist, police reservist or any other civic duty.

- Take care of your parents when they are old. Etc…

Here are some entitlements: - Free healthcare

- Free welfare payments

- Cash payments for each child born.

- Free education and university

- Gauranteed salary throughout your life (whether employed or not). Some countries call this a "basic income grant".

Re: A successful academic faces lifelong debt

#60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I know you were being sarcastic, but this is 100% true. Doing what you love, instead of what is useful, is a privilege, not a right.

And yet persistent threads in entrepreneurial discussions on HN is 'find your passion, the follow it' and 'make something great, if you build it they will come'. I agree with these ideas, the whole point of a large open economy (and one that is compounded by the internet) is that there's a market for everything and if you're really good at what you do then you'll get by. The point of meritocracy is to reward excellen…

Totally agree. "They" should be paying her a lot more because it's completely unfair to let the market set wages.
Post reply on HN