Live data from Hacker News

OpenSSL Security Advisory

openssl.org

41–50 of 142 posts

Re: OpenSSL Security Advisory

#41
post #22

It´s for old version. For example actual debian not affected. https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-1793

'actual debian' made me smile .)

all quibbling aside, most people would probably need an explanation to understand your post, as the recent version of debian is indeed affected, as in debian-unstable (sid)'s openssl.

Re: OpenSSL Security Advisory

#43
Why has the adoption of alternative SSL software been so low. We have libressl, boringssl, something from Amazon? Very few Linux distributions seem interested in shipping alternative SSL software.

Re: OpenSSL Security Advisory

#45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unless you are using client side certificates, this one is not your problem. But everybody must upgrade their browsers ASAP.

Well, Firefox and Chrome use NSS, IE uses SChannel. Not sure about Safari or mobile browsers, but I believe the majority of desktop browsers will be safe.

Safari uses Apple's own TLS library, SecureTransport. Apple deprecated OpenSSL long ago.

Re: OpenSSL Security Advisory

#46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is that right? My reading of it is that this affects all cases where you verify the certificate

Yes and most web servers do not use client certificates and do not have any need to validate certificates.

Yes but in practice a lot of them do, for example, when they download a library from PyPI or rubygems...? Unless we're talking just about when people use client certificates as authentication?

Re: OpenSSL Security Advisory

#47

So, updating server side OpenSSL will not close this vulnerability (for servers offering https-protected websites)? Is that correct? If I understand the advisory correctly then this means that somebody could set up a webserver with a specially-crafted certificate and pretend to be somebody else, assuming that the client is running a vulnerable version of OpenSSL. Is that right? I wish they would write these advisorie…

Yes, this is a client side bug.

And servers that are authenticating client certs?

(clearly there are far fewer of those around but they do exist)

Re: OpenSSL Security Advisory

#48
post #35
post #4

> OpenSSL will attempt to find an alternative certificate chain if the first attempt to build such a chain fails I think the latest big thing I've learned in my career is that trying to fix broken input data silently is always bad. Fixing stuff silently isn't helpful for the callers, it's very difficult to do and it produces additional code which also isn't running in the normal case, so it's much more likely to be b…

This seems to be a common opinion recently, see https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-postel-was-wrong-0...

I wouldn't say he is wrong, so much as you just need a dev mode where strict acceptance is the order of the day. You need people to learn to produce correct results, but still be resilient in the field.

Re: OpenSSL Security Advisory

#49

Why has the adoption of alternative SSL software been so low. We have libressl, boringssl, something from Amazon? Very few Linux distributions seem interested in shipping alternative SSL software.

Because despite bug history of OpenSSL, nothing proved to be more reliable to this moment.
Post reply on HN