Exploring dark energy with robots
symmetrymagazine.org
Exploring dark energy with robots
1–8 of 8 posts
Re: Exploring dark energy with robots
#2Dark energy is such a stupid term. You can tell it's a term designed to court funding, and garner intrigue.
If they used the term "unknown energy" instead, review boards would look at the grant proposal and just shake their heads. Maybe "unexplained/anticipated energy" would stand a better chance as a term. For added excitement, the three letter acronym UAE could be used to foster an impression of technical expertise and mystery.
Re: Exploring dark energy with robots
#3Dark energy is not only a stupid term, it's a stupid topic. -- Even I can write spectacular papers on "dark energy".
My main statement: -- There are two opposing assumptions concerning measured increase of distances between galaxies (redshift): a) Redshift is about velocity of masses IN space (about force, momentum, energy) or b) it is about scaling OF space itself (a factor like time is, not about force, momentum, energy).
For nearly a century physicists know the latter is true, but calculate and argue with the former assumption (called 'dark energy' later on). -- Not because they are idiots but because they think people are and will not notice Einstein was wrong. -- More:
http://ow.ly/MrQgy
http://ow.ly/LGgJo
Re: Exploring dark energy with robots
#4Dark energy is such a stupid term. You can tell it's a term designed to court funding, and garner intrigue. If they used the term "unknown energy" instead, review boards would look at the grant proposal and just shake their heads. Maybe "unexplained/anticipated energy" would stand a better chance as a term. For added excitement, the three letter acronym UAE could be used to foster an impression of technical expertise…
Huh, weird. It's almost as if scientists and researchers had to consider how to best communicate with people.
Re: Exploring dark energy with robots
#5Dark energy is such a stupid term. You can tell it's a term designed to court funding, and garner intrigue. If they used the term "unknown energy" instead, review boards would look at the grant proposal and just shake their heads. Maybe "unexplained/anticipated energy" would stand a better chance as a term. For added excitement, the three letter acronym UAE could be used to foster an impression of technical expertise…
Huh, weird. It's almost as if scientists and researchers had to consider how to best communicate with people.
Sadly these scientists of DARKNESS do not communicate at all with people (and stay stupid).
http://ow.ly/MrQgy#hossenfelder
Re: Exploring dark energy with robots
#6Earlier quoted context omitted.
Huh, weird. It's almost as if scientists and researchers had to consider how to best communicate with people.
Sadly these scientists of DARKNESS do not communicate at all with people (and stay stupid). http://ow.ly/MrQgy#hossenfelder
That article sure does focus on what a bad guy Einstein was, instead of on actual research and facts.
Re: Exploring dark energy with robots
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sadly these scientists of DARKNESS do not communicate at all with people (and stay stupid). http://ow.ly/MrQgy#hossenfelder
That article sure does focus on what a bad guy Einstein was, instead of on actual research and facts.
You are right of course. And I have to accept why scientists refuse reading my blog post. It's indeed not research in its own right - it simply tells what 1+1 gives.
Re: Exploring dark energy with robots
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
That article sure does focus on what a bad guy Einstein was, instead of on actual research and facts.
You are right of course. And I have to accept why scientists refuse reading my blog post. It's indeed not research in its own right - it simply tells what 1+1 gives.
> I have to accept why scientists refuse reading my blog post
Or you could show some adaptability.