Live data from Hacker News

An Hour with Safari Content Blocker in iOS 9

murphyapps.co

71–74 of 74 posts

Re: An Hour with Safari Content Blocker in iOS 9

#71
post #64

Sadly, this won't be the end of intrusive advertising. It will just go underground. I think as a result of wide-spread ad blocking we'll see three worrying trends develop. 1. More paid-only content More content will go behind pay gates and login gates, like the NYT site, as sites scramble to monetize. This is bad for society as a whole as we lose free access to information. 2. Advertising goes server-side Advertising…

> In the future, ads will be indistinguishable from content, and [the] already shaky wall between editorial and advertising will collapse completely. If anything, that should give us even more reason to attack this new form of advertising. Ad-blockers were born out of a pretty mild inconvenience. But hidden ads are far more sinister, and thus - should result in far more people coming up with ways to remove them. > No…

We're not talking about a little side cash. All independent (most of the web) middle-sized publishers like me would have to lay off people (who are not all college kids, some who support have families).

I caution people who think ad block is "sticking it to the man" because only corporations are going to survive a sudden drought if the ad-supported model dries up. It will kill the indies almost instantly and corporate will just figure out a way around it after they're done picking up bodies at a discount.

Re: An Hour with Safari Content Blocker in iOS 9

#72
Thought experiment for anyone not yet tired of the "is blocking ads unethical" discussion:

Imagine there is a news website with content you want to read.

When you go to the site for the first time, you're presented with the following text:

"This site and it's content are entirely supported by display advertisement. You are free to consume this content as much as you like as long as you agree to allow our advertisements to be displayed in your browser. If these terms are unacceptable to you, please do not continue consuming our content. No hard feelings."

Would it be ethical to block ads on this website?

Re: An Hour with Safari Content Blocker in iOS 9

#73
post #69

So now that Apple is saying you can't make money on the mobile web with iOS, everyone will have to make an app with unblockable ads. Great for the app store. What happens to discoverability when your content isn't on the mobile web (and with google penalizing you for not having a mobile friendly site)?

As a publisher I envision redirecting all iOS users to an app download page. Which means Android users would happily browse the page with free content while Apple users are forced to install an app. Not really the best sales argument for Apple? Especially if you consider that the app probably requires permission to get a lot more of your data than any webpage ever could... Nicely done Apple! :-)

The user will just refuse to give the app those permissions.

Re: An Hour with Safari Content Blocker in iOS 9

#74
post #54

I have basicaly been running this "experiment" for the last 20 years. It began with (e.g., text-only) browsers that do not source content from other domains automatically, then I started blocking ads via DNS in response to today's "locked-down" computers like smartphones. I just do not see ads. I often need not even visit a webpage. I just download the content I want, directly, using a custom filter. Do long load tim…

Yeah, I have been using HOSTS file adblocker for years and it performs better than AdBlock Plus. On iOS, you can set your own controlled DNS server with a blacklist of ad servers.
Post reply on HN