Live data from Hacker News

Are techies really 57% more likely to apply for a job if they know the salary?

hackajob.co

11–20 of 51 posts

Re: Are techies really 57% more likely to apply for a job if they know the salary?

#11
post #10

Especially when "the first stage of our selection process is a 90 minute online coding test". You expect me to do that when I know very little about the job and don't even know what I am going to be paid?

That's a fair enough comment, job application processes are getting longer and more time consuming - sometimes out of need for getting the right people.

Any ideas as to why salaries might be left as something broad like 'competitive'?

Re: Are techies really 57% more likely to apply for a job if they know the salary?

#12
Defining your salary as "competitive" is worthless since everyone does it (although I saw a job description with "salary: decent" once :) ).

Clearly, being open about the salary gives you a big advantage, applicants know what they can expect and are more willing to spend time going through your interview process. When dealing with recruiters, I only answer their cold email if the salary is listed (among location, company name, tech stack).

One note of caution: if you advertise a range (e.g. 90k to 120k) you should have clear criteria in mind to decided what to offer in your range. As a candidate, I would want to understand why I'm offered 95k instead of 110k for example.

Re: Are techies really 57% more likely to apply for a job if they know the salary?

#13
post #7

Showing sallaries saves everyone's time and money, some people want higher wages, others are willing to go for the same, just want to change.. Really depends.

Showing salaries would seem to be a way of offering transparency. One worry might be people going for a higher paying role with just that intent.

Why do you think companies might not show salaries?

Re: Are techies really 57% more likely to apply for a job if they know the salary?

#14
post #12

Defining your salary as "competitive" is worthless since everyone does it (although I saw a job description with "salary: decent" once :) ). Clearly, being open about the salary gives you a big advantage, applicants know what they can expect and are more willing to spend time going through your interview process. When dealing with recruiters, I only answer their cold email if the salary is listed (among location, com…

'Decent' is brilliant haha! :) Not seen that one yet. Your modus operandi, and note of caution are also spot on IMO.

Transparency (not just on salary, but role/skill expectations too) would appear to build trust. What can firms that can't offer as much do, do you think?

Re: Are techies really 57% more likely to apply for a job if they know the salary?

#15

not me. What i care about is where the office is located, whether there is anything to do in the area around the office, what technologies i will work with and whether i regard the company as ethical. I once worked for a former white panther at half the salary i could have commanded anywhere ele.

Your rationale is certainly a strong one - salary is but only one consideration in the end.

What was your experience with the former white panther like?

Re: Are techies really 57% more likely to apply for a job if they know the salary?

#16

Personally? I am 100% more likely.

Likewise, especially since "competitive" is such a huge range. As an example, if I'm currently making $100k, I might entertain a position at a slightly interesting company that's offering a "competitive" salary of $95k. However, I don't think there's anything that would make me go through the hassle of interviewing for a job paying a "competitive" $60k.

Basically, posting the salary range gives me a quick and easy way to weed out those companies which aren't serious without a significant investment of my time.

Re: Are techies really 57% more likely to apply for a job if they know the salary?

#17
post #12

Defining your salary as "competitive" is worthless since everyone does it (although I saw a job description with "salary: decent" once :) ). Clearly, being open about the salary gives you a big advantage, applicants know what they can expect and are more willing to spend time going through your interview process. When dealing with recruiters, I only answer their cold email if the salary is listed (among location, com…

'Decent' is brilliant haha! :) Not seen that one yet. Your modus operandi, and note of caution are also spot on IMO. Transparency (not just on salary, but role/skill expectations too) would appear to build trust. What can firms that can't offer as much do, do you think?

Heh, "Decent" is more likely to make me apply than "Competitive" because it shows that they know what good developers cost and are acknowledging they're not paying top rate.

Re: Are techies really 57% more likely to apply for a job if they know the salary?

#18
post #16

Personally? I am 100% more likely.

Likewise, especially since "competitive" is such a huge range. As an example, if I'm currently making $100k, I might entertain a position at a slightly interesting company that's offering a "competitive" salary of $95k. However, I don't think there's anything that would make me go through the hassle of interviewing for a job paying a "competitive" $60k. Basically, posting the salary range gives me a quick and easy wa…

So a displayed salary range (perhaps $5-15k in swing?) in any case offers something more tangible/clear than 'competitive'?

I could certainly agree with that. It doesn't confine a company to a certain $x, but isn't as opaque as the bog standard 'competitive.'

Re: Are techies really 57% more likely to apply for a job if they know the salary?

#19
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

'Decent' is brilliant haha! :) Not seen that one yet. Your modus operandi, and note of caution are also spot on IMO. Transparency (not just on salary, but role/skill expectations too) would appear to build trust. What can firms that can't offer as much do, do you think?

Heh, "Decent" is more likely to make me apply than "Competitive" because it shows that they know what good developers cost and are acknowledging they're not paying top rate.

Mm, it does suggest value in an acknowledging way.

Any other words/phrases you've seen in your job travels/perusings haha (for better or worse)?

Post reply on HN