Mawww's experiment for a better code editor
1–10 of 16 posts
Re: Mawww's experiment for a better code editor
#2My question is, could this be implemented on top of an existing editor, like Sublime or Atom?
I'm guessing that that would lower the barrier of entry for most people, including me. (I for example, found the demo video very interesting, but knowing that I'd then have to give up all the customizations I've built up in my favorite editor, I was a bit discouraged to actually try it.)
Re: Mawww's experiment for a better code editor
#3Re: Mawww's experiment for a better code editor
#4It would be nice to see some comments from the author(s) on the current stability/roadmap. Or at least a proper release; am I using alpha-quality software here, or what? I don't always like to be running my workhorse software tools on the bleeding edge of the developer's repository.
Re: Mawww's experiment for a better code editor
#5Re: Mawww's experiment for a better code editor
#6Wow, this actually looks really neat. I have been playing around with it for a few minutes and it seems _much_ more usable than I was expecting from an "experiment". It would be nice to see some comments from the author(s) on the current stability/roadmap. Or at least a proper release; am I using alpha-quality software here, or what? I don't always like to be running my workhorse software tools on the bleeding edge o…
Re: Mawww's experiment for a better code editor
#7This is very interesting. My question is, could this be implemented on top of an existing editor, like Sublime or Atom? I'm guessing that that would lower the barrier of entry for most people, including me. (I for example, found the demo video very interesting, but knowing that I'd then have to give up all the customizations I've built up in my favorite editor, I was a bit discouraged to actually try it.)
Re: Mawww's experiment for a better code editor
#8This looks awesome.
Re: Mawww's experiment for a better code editor
#9Well, I stopped right there. I'm old enough to know better.